Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/4339

Bill Overview

Title: DHS Illicit Cross-Border Tunnel Defense Act

Description: This bill authorizes for FY2023 and FY2024 U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) activities to identify and remediate illicit cross-border tunnels. CBP shall also develop and report to Congress a strategic plan to guide and improve such operations.

Sponsors: Sen. Cornyn, John [R-TX]

Target Audience

Population: People living or working near US borders

Estimated Size: 4000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

border patrol agent (San Diego, CA)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy may advance our existing operations, providing more resources for tunnel detection.
  • Improving tunnel defense operations would make my job more satisfying and successful.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

local business owner (El Paso, TX)

Age: 39 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Increased border security can stabilize safety, which may attract more customers.
  • Any inconvenience during construction could temporarily affect business traffic.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 6

unemployed (Tucson, AZ)

Age: 28 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • If jobs are created through this policy, it could provide new opportunities for me.
  • I'm concerned about how long these projects will last and if they offer long-term employment.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 5 4
Year 5 5 4
Year 10 5 3
Year 20 4 3

social worker (Laredo, TX)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Focus on tunnel detection might shift resources from other migration support services.
  • Increased security may drive migrant behavior underground, increasing risks for migrants.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 6
Year 2 5 6
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 4 5
Year 10 5 6
Year 20 6 6

retired (Nogales, AZ)

Age: 62 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Increased attention to cross-border tunnels is essential for community safety.
  • I believe our town will experience less worry about illegal crossings.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 7 6

high school student (Yuma, AZ)

Age: 17 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's important to feel secure in our town, knowing efforts are being made to stop illegal activities.
  • I'm considering a future career with CBP, so this policy interests me.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 7 7

farm owner (Santa Teresa, NM)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Increased border security could disrupt the labor force I rely on.
  • Continued open borders are important for agricultural jobs.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 6 7
Year 20 6 7

national park ranger (Brownsville, TX)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 9

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The ecological conservation could benefit from heightened security minimizing illegal crossings.
  • I fear increased tensions might negatively impact cross-border tourism.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 9
Year 2 9 9
Year 3 9 9
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 8 8

immigration lawyer (McAllen, TX)

Age: 46 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 6.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Tougher border security might complicate legal aid services offered to undocumented migrants.
  • My clients could face increased difficulties, which may further stress an already difficult process.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 4 5
Year 2 4 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 6
Year 10 5 6
Year 20 6 6

logistics manager (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 55 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Impact of border policy on shipping is limited at large ports like ours, with minor customs delays being possible if resources are redirected.
  • These policies don't immediately affect our operations significantly.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 7 7

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $5000000 (Low: $4000000, High: $6000000)

Year 2: $5200000 (Low: $4200000, High: $6200000)

Year 3: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 5: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations