Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/4333

Bill Overview

Title: CLEAR Act

Description: This bill requires the Food and Drug Administration to regulate contrast agents for medical imaging devices, radioactive drugs, over-the-counter monograph drugs, and ophthalmic drug articles (i.e., eye droppers) as drugs rather than medical devices.

Sponsors: Sen. Smith, Tina [D-MN]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals using medical imaging, radioactive drugs, OTC monograph drugs, and/or ophthalmic drug articles

Estimated Size: 250000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

IT Specialist (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 32 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I rely a lot on OTC drugs and I've used imaging for health checks quite frequently.
  • If regulations improve safety, it's worth the trouble, but I hope it doesn't make access or cost worse.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Nuclear Medicine Physician (Houston, TX)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • My professional life revolves around these materials, so clear regulations will help improve treatment safety.
  • The policy must carefully balance between improving safety and ensuring availability.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 7 8

Retired School Teacher (Syracuse, NY)

Age: 70 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm concerned about the pricing if regulations change eye medications.
  • Still, safety improvements could be crucial for older individuals like myself.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Graduate Student (Chicago, IL)

Age: 27 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I hope this doesn't lead to increased costs or hassle in getting OTC meds and imaging.
  • Clearer safety guidelines are a good thing, but execution is key.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 8 6

Pharmacist (Miami, FL)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This is likely to impact how we stock and educate clients about OTC and eyedrop drugs.
  • I just hope the transition is smooth for both professionals and consumers.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Marketing Manager (Portland, OR)

Age: 29 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 16/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm not personally worried, but any improvement in safety is a win.
  • I hope it doesn't create shortages or higher costs.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Retired Engineer (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Proper regulation is important, but it shouldn't make accessing medication difficult or more expensive.
  • Improved safety would be appreciated.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Medical Imaging Technician (New York, NY)

Age: 41 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I foresee more precise rules increasing safety in imaging procedures.
  • The execution of new regulations is crucial to avoid operational burdens.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Retired (Kansas City, MO)

Age: 65 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Any step towards safer drugs and procedures is worthwhile, but they need to remain affordable.
  • I'm worried about potential increases in drug prices.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Healthcare Policy Analyst (Seattle, WA)

Age: 38 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy is crucial for aligning safety standards.
  • It will be interesting to observe market responses and adaptation to new regulations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 9 7

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $88000000 (Low: $65000000, High: $110000000)

Year 2: $90000000 (Low: $67000000, High: $115000000)

Year 3: $92000000 (Low: $69000000, High: $118000000)

Year 5: $95000000 (Low: $71000000, High: $125000000)

Year 10: $99000000 (Low: $75000000, High: $130000000)

Year 100: $100000000 (Low: $75000000, High: $132000000)

Key Considerations