Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/4326

Bill Overview

Title: Transnational Criminal Investigative Unit Stipend Act

Description: This bill requires the Department of Homeland Security to operate Transnational Criminal Investigative Units within U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Homeland Security Investigations (HSI). The units shall be composed of vetted foreign law enforcement officials who shall cooperate with HSI to investigate and prosecute individuals involved in transnational criminal activity.

Sponsors: Sen. Portman, Rob [R-OH]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals impacted by ICE and HSI transnational criminal investigations

Estimated Size: 50000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Border Security Agent (El Paso, TX)

Age: 42 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think the policy will strengthen our ability to combat crime by allowing us to work more closely with foreign agents.
  • I'm concerned about the added workload and changes to our operational procedures.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 6

Human Rights Activist (San Diego, CA)

Age: 35 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm cautiously optimistic about the transnational collaboration potentially reducing human trafficking, but I worry about increased deportations.
  • Protecting vulnerable populations should be prioritized.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 6 7
Year 10 6 7
Year 20 6 7

Small Business Owner (Austin, TX)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I worry this policy might inadvertently complicate business due to increased scrutiny at the border.
  • Cross-border collaboration is positive, but it should not hinder lawful activities.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 8
Year 2 7 8
Year 3 7 8
Year 5 7 8
Year 10 7 8
Year 20 7 8

Lawyer (Miami, FL)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The increase in investigations may affect my clients involved in ongoing immigration cases.
  • I am concerned about the potential for wrongful accusations without proper vetting.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

International Diplomat (New York, NY)

Age: 40 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • International cooperation is essential, and this policy supports that.
  • Diplomatic relations will play a critical role in making this policy effective.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 7

Retired Teacher (Brownsville, TX)

Age: 61 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm hopeful that the policy will address some of the crime issues in our community.
  • Monitoring its impact on local communities is essential to avoid any negative effects.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 5

IT Consultant (Chicago, IL)

Age: 38 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I don't see this policy impacting me directly as it primarily deals with border and international law enforcement issues.
  • Maintaining a fair system is always important.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Journalist (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 47 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Increased transparency in law enforcement is crucial, and this policy could enhance accountability.
  • Concerned about the potential lack of oversight when working with foreign officials.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 6 7
Year 5 6 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Federal Agent (Denver, CO)

Age: 55 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy could enhance our ability to track illegal networks.
  • Concerned about the need for additional resources and funding to handle the increase in collaborative cases.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

College Student (New Orleans, LA)

Age: 26 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm interested to see how this policy might influence international law enforcement collaborations in the future.
  • The policy might open up job opportunities in international arenas post-graduation.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $50000000 (Low: $40000000, High: $60000000)

Year 2: $51000000 (Low: $40800000, High: $61200000)

Year 3: $52020000 (Low: $41616000, High: $62424000)

Year 5: $54080820 (Low: $43264656, High: $64921884)

Year 10: $59548446 (Low: $47638757, High: $71458135)

Year 100: $160486188 (Low: $128388950, High: $192583426)

Key Considerations