Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/4226

Bill Overview

Title: Urgently Feeding America’s Babies Act of 2022

Description: This bill addresses a shortage in the domestic supply of infant formula. Specifically, the bill directs the President to immediately use existing authorities under the Defense Production Act of 1950 to ensure the supply of infant formula. That act confers upon the President a broad set of authorities to influence domestic industry in order to provide essential materials and goods needed for the national defense. In addition, the Food and Drug Administration must (1) establish, within 15 days, a process to allow importation of infant formula from the European Union; and (2) publish safety guidelines for imported infant formula.

Sponsors: Sen. Rubio, Marco [R-FL]

Target Audience

Population: People who rely on infant formula to feed babies

Estimated Size: 10000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Marketing Manager (New York, NY)

Age: 35 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Very concerned about the ongoing formula shortages, it's been a constant source of stress.
  • Hopeful that increased production and imports will alleviate the issues temporarily.
  • Worried about the long-term sustainability of formula supply.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 4
Year 2 6 3
Year 3 6 3
Year 5 5 3
Year 10 5 3
Year 20 5 3

Software Developer (Austin, TX)

Age: 30 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's challenging to find the right formula type frequently.
  • The policy seems like a necessary step, especially for specialty formulas which are already hard to find.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 3
Year 2 5 2
Year 3 5 2
Year 5 4 2
Year 10 4 2
Year 20 4 2

Freelancer (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The shortage has made it extremely difficult to maintain a stable feeding schedule.
  • Any improvement in the situation would be welcome, hopeful this policy will help.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 6 4

Nurse (Chicago, IL)

Age: 42 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The decision to focus on importation is sensible given the domestic production issues.
  • Concerns about safety standards for imports but willing to trust FDA oversight.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 4
Year 2 7 3
Year 3 6 3
Year 5 5 3
Year 10 5 3
Year 20 5 3

Financial Analyst (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 36 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Appreciates the government taking action, though the personal impact is low due to child weaning.
  • Believes this could help stabilize related job sectors too.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 6
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Receptionist (Miami, FL)

Age: 25 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 3

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's been emotionally and financially draining to secure the right formula.
  • This policy gives hope but there are concerns about continued availability.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 2
Year 2 6 2
Year 3 5 2
Year 5 5 2
Year 10 5 2
Year 20 5 2

Engineer (Seattle, WA)

Age: 39 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's concerning to see such a critical issue arise, but we aren't affected personally.
  • It's important the government addresses these kinds of shortages.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Elementary School Teacher (Salt Lake City, UT)

Age: 31 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 0.5 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Fortunately, we haven't had to rely much on formula, but I buy it as a safety net.
  • It's scary to think formulas might not be there if needed.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 5 4

Store Manager (Houston, TX)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Running out of formula has been a real problem both personally and professionally.
  • The policy seems necessary but changes need to happen fast.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 3
Year 2 5 3
Year 3 5 3
Year 5 4 3
Year 10 4 3
Year 20 4 3

Stay-at-home Mom (Denver, CO)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I just want to ensure my baby is getting what she needs without worry.
  • The policy could prevent us from facing supply issues, which is a relief.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 4
Year 2 7 4
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 5 4

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $2000000000 (Low: $1500000000, High: $2500000000)

Year 2: $1800000000 (Low: $1400000000, High: $2200000000)

Year 3: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 5: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations