Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/4200

Bill Overview

Title: Secure Research Data Network Act

Description: This bill establishes a Secure Research Data Network (SRDN) pilot program in the National Science Foundation (NSF). The NSF shall direct the SRDN to carry out specified responsibilities, including supporting governmentwide evidence-building activities to support policymaking including implementation of agency multiyear evidence-building plans, deploying and operating a SRDN platform for authorized analysts to calculate statistics on data for evidence-building activity purposes using data assets made available by reporting entities for approved projects, and consulting with the National Artificial Intelligence Research Resource Task Force and considering how to integrate the Task Force's recommendations and road map for expanding access to critical artificial intelligence resources and educational tools into the SRDN. The NSF shall direct the SRDN to develop a plan for and operate a data quality service team who will help reporting entities evaluate their data and prepare it for use with the SRDN platform to achieve approved project goals. The NSF shall establish a SRDN Advisory Board. The Government Accountability Office shall conduct an evaluation of the SRDN pilot program.

Sponsors: Sen. Wyden, Ron [D-OR]

Target Audience

Population: Researchers, analysts, data-providing entities, and policymakers working with data on an international scale

Estimated Size: 60000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Government Policy Analyst (Washington, D.C.)

Age: 35 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy is important for improving evidence-based policy making.
  • In the short term, there might be an adjustment phase as we figure out efficient ways to integrate new systems.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

AI Research Scientist (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 44 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The integration of AI into these datasets is crucial for our work.
  • Hopefully, this leads to better resource allocation for AI development.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 10 8
Year 20 10 9

University Data Science Professor (New York City, NY)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Access to secure data for research will enhance the quality of our projects.
  • The support for data quality is much needed.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 10 7
Year 20 10 7

Startup Data Analyst (Austin, TX)

Age: 29 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I hope having more accessible data will open up opportunities for startups like ours.
  • I'm concerned about how long integration might take.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 8 6

Healthcare Data Manager (Boston, MA)

Age: 39 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 6.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Improved data quality could significantly enhance healthcare analytics.
  • The program may set new standards for data handling in healthcare.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Freelance Journalist (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 32 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Making data more secure is a key part of public trust.
  • The impact on journalism won't be direct, but it could improve sources' reliability.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 7

Government Advisor (Chicago, IL)

Age: 41 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This could be a great step forward in using data effectively for policy decisions.
  • The advisory board's structure will be critical for success.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 9

Corporate Data Strategist (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 48 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 9

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Harmonization across different sectors will make compliance easier.
  • Could provide a framework for responsible data sharing.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 9
Year 2 9 9
Year 3 9 9
Year 5 9 9
Year 10 10 9
Year 20 10 9

Data Engineer (Seattle, WA)

Age: 27 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Technological advancements in data handling can boost my field.
  • Hoping this pilot can inform best practices industry-wide.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 9
Year 10 9 9
Year 20 10 9

Research Scientist (Denver, CO)

Age: 36 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 6.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy might streamline the research process.
  • Greater data access leads to more robust research outcomes.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $50000000 (Low: $45000000, High: $60000000)

Year 2: $52000000 (Low: $47000000, High: $62000000)

Year 3: $53500000 (Low: $48500000, High: $63500000)

Year 5: $56000000 (Low: $51000000, High: $66000000)

Year 10: $60000000 (Low: $55000000, High: $70000000)

Year 100: $80000000 (Low: $70000000, High: $90000000)

Key Considerations