Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/4195

Bill Overview

Title: PEACE through Music Diplomacy Act

Description: This bill authorizes music-related exchange programs facilitated by the Department of State. The bill authorizes the inclusion of coordination and consultation with the private sector in the participation by groups and individuals from other countries in nonprofit activities in the United States similar to certain artistic and sports activities when such participation is in the national interest. State's Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) shall manage, including in coordination and consultation with the private sector, programs focused on music and the performing arts that provide opportunities to build cross-cultural understanding and advance peace abroad. State should continue to (1) partner with the private sector in support of music-related exchange programs implemented by ECA, (2) leverage private sector expertise in developing and implementing such programs, (3) expand networking and mentorship opportunities, and (4) identify private sector funding sources for travel and other expenses. The bill authorizes State to partner with the private sector to recognize musicians whose works or performances have advanced peace abroad and who could contribute to networking and mentorship opportunities for participants of music-related exchange programs implemented by ECA.

Sponsors: Sen. Leahy, Patrick J. [D-VT]

Target Audience

Population: People involved or affected by music-related exchange programs globally

Estimated Size: 500000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

music teacher (Austin, TX)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I believe this policy could bring much-needed attention and resources to music education.
  • If executed well, it might provide my students with more opportunities for cross-cultural understanding.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

concert promoter (New York, NY)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy should expand the pool of international talents I can work with.
  • It might lead to more diverse and enriched concert experiences.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 10 8
Year 20 10 8

singer-songwriter (Nashville, TN)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'd love to participate in such programs, but it depends on the availability and access.
  • It could open new avenues for collaboration and understanding through music.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

cultural event organizer (Chicago, IL)

Age: 52 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The act has potential if it encourages more inclusive festivals and events that aren't just one-off.
  • Networking opportunities will be invaluable.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

student (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 25 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 18/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This initiative could enhance my studies through practical exposure.
  • Hands-on experience with musicians worldwide would be ideal.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

music industry executive (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 48 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 6.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • A policy like this could streamline finding international talent.
  • Private sector collaboration is a promising aspect.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

recording artist (Seattle, WA)

Age: 38 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • More structured exchanges mean more collaboration possibilities.
  • It helps broaden musical horizons and creates new sounds.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 10 9
Year 20 10 9

college student (Boston, MA)

Age: 22 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The program could complement my academic interests with practical learning.
  • Playing in different cultural contexts can expand my musical perception.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 9 8

retired music professor (Denver, CO)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Such programs can bring diverse cultural perspectives to local communities.
  • It can revive interest in traditional music forms.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 9 8

music therapist (Miami, FL)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Global exposure can enrich therapy techniques expanding its effectiveness.
  • Collaborating on an international level could diversify treatment methods.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 8

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $10000000 (Low: $8000000, High: $12000000)

Year 2: $10500000 (Low: $8500000, High: $12500000)

Year 3: $11025000 (Low: $9000000, High: $13000000)

Year 5: $12150000 (Low: $10000000, High: $14000000)

Year 10: $15000000 (Low: $12500000, High: $17500000)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations