Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/4165

Bill Overview

Title: CDFI Crisis Fund Act

Description: This bill establishes the CDFI National Crisis Fund. The fund is authorized to make grants to community development financial institutions (CDFIs) providing financial products as emergency assistance to small businesses and low-income populations in certain circumstances. Furthermore, the fund is triggered by certain emergency declarations, including the COVID-19 emergency period; certain disaster declarations; a specified increase in a statewide unemployment rate; or a specified increase in the nationwide unemployment rate. Specified amounts in the fund are set aside for grants to Native and minority CDFIs. The Government Accountability Office must report on the impact of the fund and provide recommendations.

Sponsors: Sen. Schatz, Brian [D-HI]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals in low-income populations and small business owners served by CDFIs

Estimated Size: 50000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Small Business Owner (Detroit, MI)

Age: 35 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The support from CDFIs during the pandemic was crucial for keeping my business afloat.
  • I'm hopeful that the new policy will provide quicker responses and better funding during future crises.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 4
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 5 3
Year 20 4 3

Freelance Graphic Designer (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 42 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 1.5 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • CDFIs have been helpful when I've needed financial products that banks were unwilling to provide.
  • The policy seems like it could be a strong safety net.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 5 4
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 4 3

Non-Profit Worker (Oakland, CA)

Age: 27 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Our community relies heavily on CDFIs for affordable housing and development projects.
  • The additional support could lead to more stable and timely project funding.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 4

Retired Teacher (Jackson, MS)

Age: 54 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 0.5 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I've heard of CDFIs but never used them.
  • If they help during emergencies, maybe our community could benefit.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Community Organizer (Navajo Nation, AZ)

Age: 30 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy could mean increased funding for our projects, which is much needed.
  • I've seen CDFIs make a real difference when they have the resources.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 4
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 5 3
Year 20 5 3

Health Care Worker (Houston, TX)

Age: 38 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 3

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Having financial safety nets is reassuring, especially considering past struggles.
  • I haven't used a CDFI directly, but knowing there's more to rely on is comforting.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 3
Year 2 5 4
Year 3 5 4
Year 5 4 4
Year 10 4 3
Year 20 4 3

Small Equipment Manufacturer (Chicago, IL)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Emergency loans from CDFIs were crucial; further support feels timely.
  • This policy could prevent future financial distress during emergencies.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 4
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 5 4
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 4 4

Restaurant Manager (New Orleans, LA)

Age: 47 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 3

Duration of Impact: 2.5 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The idea of more robust financial assistance during disasters is promising.
  • I'm cautiously optimistic about the policy's potential.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 3
Year 2 5 4
Year 3 5 4
Year 5 4 4
Year 10 4 3
Year 20 4 3

College Student (Brooklyn, NY)

Age: 21 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Not sure if CDFIs apply to me but knowing there's financial support during crises is good to know.
  • Could be useful in times I need financial products beyond what the college financial aid covers.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Retired Farmer (Rural Kansas)

Age: 68 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Not particularly relevant to me at this time.
  • If emergencies arose in the community, having more financial options might be beneficial.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $75000000 (Low: $50000000, High: $100000000)

Year 2: $75000000 (Low: $50000000, High: $100000000)

Year 3: $80000000 (Low: $60000000, High: $110000000)

Year 5: $85000000 (Low: $60000000, High: $120000000)

Year 10: $95000000 (Low: $70000000, High: $130000000)

Year 100: $150000000 (Low: $100000000, High: $200000000)

Key Considerations