Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/4133

Bill Overview

Title: Expedited Disability Insurance Payments for Terminally Ill Individuals Act of 2022

Description: This bill temporarily allows an individual diagnosed with a terminal illness with a life expectancy of six months or less to receive Social Security disability benefits during the waiting period for such benefits (which typically lasts five months). It also establishes a phased-in payment schedule for the benefits.

Sponsors: Sen. Barrasso, John [R-WY]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals with terminal illness eligible for SSDI

Estimated Size: 3000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

unemployed (Texas)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 0.5 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I am grateful for any financial assistance that can help me manage my medical bills and support my family.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 4
Year 2 0 0
Year 3 0 0
Year 5 0 0
Year 10 0 0
Year 20 0 0

retired engineer (California)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 0.5 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy would relieve financial pressure, allowing me to focus on spending quality time with my family.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 0 0
Year 3 0 0
Year 5 0 0
Year 10 0 0
Year 20 0 0

freelance artist (New York)

Age: 35 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 3

Duration of Impact: 0.5 years

Commonness: 1/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy would be a lifeline, giving me peace of mind in the last months of my life.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 3
Year 2 0 0
Year 3 0 0
Year 5 0 0
Year 10 0 0
Year 20 0 0

construction worker (Florida)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 0.5 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think this policy isn't for me, but for folks who are just finding out and could really use the support sooner.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 0 0
Year 3 0 0
Year 5 0 0
Year 10 0 0
Year 20 0 0

retired teacher (Ohio)

Age: 70 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 0.5 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy might add some comfort, but my needs are minimal at this stage.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 0 0
Year 3 0 0
Year 5 0 0
Year 10 0 0
Year 20 0 0

grocery store clerk (Illinois)

Age: 55 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 0.5 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy would allow me to ensure my children's future is a bit secure, which has been my biggest worry.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 4
Year 2 0 0
Year 3 0 0
Year 5 0 0
Year 10 0 0
Year 20 0 0

software developer (New Jersey)

Age: 33 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 0.5 years

Commonness: 1/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Financial security offered by this policy will allow me to focus on the limited time I have left with my loved ones.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 4
Year 2 0 0
Year 3 0 0
Year 5 0 0
Year 10 0 0
Year 20 0 0

restaurant manager (Kentucky)

Age: 48 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 0.5 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Receiving aid sooner means I can settle things without burdening my parents.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 0 0
Year 3 0 0
Year 5 0 0
Year 10 0 0
Year 20 0 0

fisherman (Washington)

Age: 62 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 0.5 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • If the policy covers me, the financial hardship would be easier to bear in my final months.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 6
Year 2 0 0
Year 3 0 0
Year 5 0 0
Year 10 0 0
Year 20 0 0

homemaker (Georgia)

Age: 58 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 3

Duration of Impact: 0.5 years

Commonness: 1/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This bill could provide hope and essential support during these challenging times.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 3
Year 2 0 0
Year 3 0 0
Year 5 0 0
Year 10 0 0
Year 20 0 0

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $150000000 (Low: $100000000, High: $200000000)

Year 2: $160000000 (Low: $110000000, High: $210000000)

Year 3: $170000000 (Low: $120000000, High: $220000000)

Year 5: $190000000 (Low: $130000000, High: $240000000)

Year 10: $200000000 (Low: $150000000, High: $250000000)

Year 100: $210000000 (Low: $170000000, High: $260000000)

Key Considerations