Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/4114

Bill Overview

Title: A bill to amend Public Law 99-420 to provide for the conveyance of certain Federal land in the State of Maine for use for affordable workforce housing, and for other purposes.

Description: This bill provides for the use of certain federal land in Maine for affordable workforce housing to benefit the towns on Mount Desert Island. Currently, the land is available for use as a solid waste transfer station. The bill also permits the Department of the Interior to retain no more than 15 acres of the land, to be used for housing and administrative facilities to support the purposes of Acadia National Park.

Sponsors: Sen. King, Angus S., Jr. [I-ME]

Target Audience

Population: People in Maine needing affordable workforce housing

Estimated Size: 20000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Teacher (Portland, Maine)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy could drastically change my life by making housing more affordable while keeping me close to my workplace.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 4
Year 2 7 4
Year 3 8 4
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 9 3
Year 20 8 3

Construction worker (Bangor, Maine)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Finding affordable housing has been incredibly tough, this policy would mean less financial stress for my family.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 6 3
Year 20 5 3

Park ranger (Bar Harbor, Maine)

Age: 27 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This would directly help me as housing near the park is limited and expensive, and could stabilize my living conditions.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 9 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 8 4

Retired nurse (Augusta, Maine)

Age: 62 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Though workforce housing isn't typically aimed at retirees, any addition to affordable housing could ease overall demand and benefit me indirectly.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 5 4
Year 10 4 4
Year 20 3 3

Local business owner (Lewiston, Maine)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • From a business standpoint, ensuring affordable housing helps keep my employees stable and reliable.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 7 4
Year 20 6 3

Graduate student (Bangor, Maine)

Age: 24 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 3

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It would be life-changing to have more affordable housing options as a student struggling to make ends meet.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 3
Year 2 6 3
Year 3 7 2
Year 5 7 1
Year 10 8 1
Year 20 7 1

Nurse (Brunswick, Maine)

Age: 40 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • We're not in dire conditions, but it would ease financial burdens if more housing options were accessible.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 7 3
Year 10 6 2
Year 20 5 2

Software developer (South Portland, Maine)

Age: 29 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I might not personally need the help, but supporting affordable housing strengthens the entire community.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 5 5

Factory worker (Rockland, Maine)

Age: 53 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This could be an essential change, I'm afraid of losing my home if prices keep rising.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 4
Year 2 7 3
Year 3 7 2
Year 5 6 2
Year 10 7 1
Year 20 6 1

University professor (Orono, Maine)

Age: 38 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While I am stable, the policy could greatly benefit students and staff who are less well-off.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 4

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $5000000 (Low: $4000000, High: $6000000)

Year 2: $5200000 (Low: $4200000, High: $6200000)

Year 3: $5400000 (Low: $4400000, High: $6400000)

Year 5: $5800000 (Low: $4800000, High: $6800000)

Year 10: $6800000 (Low: $5800000, High: $7800000)

Year 100: $8500000 (Low: $7500000, High: $9500000)

Key Considerations