Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/4110

Bill Overview

Title: Primary Regulators of Insurance Vote Act of 2022

Description: This bill establishes a state insurance commissioner as a voting member of the Financial Stability Oversight Council. The member is appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate. Under current law, this member is nonvoting and selected by state insurance commissioners.

Sponsors: Sen. Scott, Tim [R-SC]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals globally who rely on financial stability and insurance regulation

Estimated Size: 340000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Insurance Broker (Detroit, MI)

Age: 52 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's interesting that the state insurance commissioner would have a vote now.
  • Any change in financial stability oversight can impact the insurance industry, possibly affecting the market dynamics.
  • I personally don't expect much change unless the FSOC takes new stances on insurance regulations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Financial Analyst (Austin, TX)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's crucial that the oversight council has diverse voting members to ensure balanced decisions.
  • If this change means better insurance regulations, it could be beneficial.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Insurance Policyholder (New York, NY)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I just hope this doesn't lead to higher premiums.
  • Regulation changes should protect consumers, not burden us more.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Retired (Birmingham, AL)

Age: 61 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • If this leads to more stable insurance markets, that's good for my peace of mind.
  • I'm worried about financial risks affecting my retirement plans.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 5

Tech Startup Entrepreneur (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 27 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 9

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • More consistent regulation could help startups like mine if it means more predictable costs.
  • I hope this doesn't translate to more red tape.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 9
Year 2 9 9
Year 3 9 9
Year 5 9 9
Year 10 9 9
Year 20 9 9

Union Worker (Chicago, IL)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I doubt this change is going to affect my insurance directly, but who knows?
  • As long as my insurance remains stable, I'm satisfied.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Freelance Writer (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 38 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This might change how insurance companies structure premiums and policies.
  • I would like more stability in my insurance payments, but this seems like a long-term effect.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Real Estate Agent (Miami, FL)

Age: 29 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • If FSOC's decisions stabilize insurance markets, it helps my business.
  • I need clear guidelines to assure my clients.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Retired Nurse (Boston, MA)

Age: 62 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Stability in the financial sector means a lot for people like me on fixed incomes.
  • I hope to see benefits in terms of less volatility in healthcare insurance.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 7 5

Environmental Scientist (Seattle, WA)

Age: 40 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • If the council's decisions create more robust financial protections, that's good.
  • I doubt immediate personal changes, but maybe longer-term stability.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $500000 (Low: $300000, High: $700000)

Year 2: $500000 (Low: $300000, High: $700000)

Year 3: $500000 (Low: $300000, High: $700000)

Year 5: $500000 (Low: $300000, High: $700000)

Year 10: $500000 (Low: $300000, High: $700000)

Year 100: $500000 (Low: $300000, High: $700000)

Key Considerations