Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/4105

Bill Overview

Title: Supply Chain Disruptions Relief Act

Description: This bill modifies the treatment of liquidations of new motor vehicle inventory as qualified LIFO (last in first out accounting method) inventory. It allows new motor vehicle dealers to elect to wait until the end of 2025 to replace their inventory for purposes of determining income attributable to the sale of such inventory during 2020 and 2021.

Sponsors: Sen. Brown, Sherrod [D-OH]

Target Audience

Population: motor vehicle dealers

Estimated Size: 16000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Owner of a franchised car dealership (Detroit, MI)

Age: 55 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy seems beneficial as it provides some breathing room to get our inventory back on track without immediate tax implications.
  • It might allow us to stabilize finances and eventually save jobs which were under threat during the pandemic.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 8 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 9 5
Year 10 9 4
Year 20 8 3

Sales manager at a car dealership (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think the policy could help us manage our finances better, especially during these unpredictable times.
  • It should help stabilize the job market within the dealership industry.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 7 5

Car mechanic (Miami, FL)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While it sounds like it's mostly for the owners, anything that keeps the dealership running is good for my job.
  • I'm cautiously optimistic but unsure how directly it will affect pay or job security for mechanics like me.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 5 4

Independent car dealership owner (Dallas, TX)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's a relief to adjust accounting for the losses during 2020 and 2021.
  • This policy might mean being able to stay open a little longer without major losses.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 7 3
Year 20 7 2

Retired car dealership accountant (New York, NY)

Age: 62 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy is long overdue for the struggling vehicle industry.
  • While it doesn't affect me directly anymore, it would have made a significant difference in my years working during the pandemic.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Franchised dealership service manager (Chicago, IL)

Age: 39 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy might stabilize our work operations and prevent layoffs.
  • It's crucial that this support comes during such a turbulent business climate.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 9 5
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 8 4

Automobile association executive (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 1/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The relief act is a significant step forward for dealerships trying to recover from recent disasters.
  • We hope this sets a precedent for more supportive policies.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 7
Year 2 9 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 8 4

Automotive journalist (Seattle, WA)

Age: 27 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy is a boon for the dealerships but far removed from ordinary consumers.
  • It helps a niche group but misses broader supply chain issues.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 4

New car sales representative (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 41 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I hope this policy helps increase availability of cars, which would directly improve my sales numbers.
  • Anything that saves jobs in the dealership is welcome.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 6 3
Year 20 6 2

Car buyer and enthusiast (Boston, MA)

Age: 48 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy seems beneficial for those directly in the industry, but I doubt it will significantly impact me immediately.
  • I'm more focused on seeing how this affects car price trends.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $1500000000 (Low: $1200000000, High: $1800000000)

Year 2: $1250000000 (Low: $1000000000, High: $1500000000)

Year 3: $1000000000 (Low: $800000000, High: $1200000000)

Year 5: $500000000 (Low: $400000000, High: $600000000)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations