Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/4088

Bill Overview

Title: PAUSE Act of 2022

Description: This bill maintains immigration restrictions put in place under public health emergency authorities to prevent the introduction of COVID-19 from foreign countries. Specifically, the bill prohibits the Department of Health and Human Services from rescinding or reducing the stringency of the restrictions. It also prohibits the Department of Homeland Security from stopping or reducing enforcement of the restrictions. These prohibitions remain in effect until (1) federal and state COVID-19 emergency orders are lifted, and (2) the risk of introducing COVID-19 in or from Canada and Mexico is minimal.

Sponsors: Sen. Cruz, Ted [R-TX]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals globally affected by US COVID-19 related immigration restrictions

Estimated Size: 10000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Border Patrol Agent (San Diego, CA)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think maintaining restrictions is critical to controlling COVID-19 here, especially with the constant flow of people across the border.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 5

International Business Consultant (Houston, TX)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • These restrictions make it very difficult to maintain business relations and visit family, adding stress to my personal and professional life.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 6
Year 2 5 7
Year 3 4 8
Year 5 4 8
Year 10 3 8
Year 20 3 8

Hotel Manager (Miami, FL)

Age: 38 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Tourism is down; these restrictions only make recovery harder as less international visitors lead to reduced revenue and job cutbacks.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 8
Year 2 7 9
Year 3 7 9
Year 5 7 9
Year 10 6 9
Year 20 6 9

Small Business Owner (El Paso, TX)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy means tighter border control, which might affect my business operations significantly. Additionally, it complicates family visits due to travel restrictions.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 4 5
Year 2 4 6
Year 3 3 6
Year 5 3 6
Year 10 2 7
Year 20 2 7

NGO Worker - Immigration Rights (New York, NY)

Age: 32 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy complicates reunification processes for families and could perpetuate hardships for those already struggling.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 4 5
Year 2 4 6
Year 3 4 6
Year 5 4 6
Year 10 5 7
Year 20 5 7

University Professor (Seattle, WA)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • From a public health perspective, temporary restrictions might be necessary, but prolonged policies could become more harmful than helpful in long-term community health dynamics.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 7
Year 2 6 7
Year 3 6 8
Year 5 7 8
Year 10 7 8
Year 20 8 8

Graduate Student (Chicago, IL)

Age: 24 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Travel restrictions limit academic experience acquisition worldwide. I've missed international conferences I had planned to attend and connecting with family abroad.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 6
Year 2 4 7
Year 3 4 7
Year 5 4 8
Year 10 5 8
Year 20 5 9

Healthcare Worker (Detroit, MI)

Age: 42 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The restrictions may reduce the influx of COVID-19 here, but they also notably delay family reunification and strain mental health amongst immigrant communities.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 7
Year 2 6 7
Year 3 6 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Retired (Minneapolis, MN)

Age: 67 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I worry more about how these restrictions affect community cohesion and local businesses that thrive on cultural diversity and international patronage.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 9
Year 5 8 9
Year 10 8 9
Year 20 8 9

Freelance Writer (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 36 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The sustained restrictions are challenging. I write about places I now can't easily visit, which hampers my work and my ability to see my family.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 7
Year 2 6 8
Year 3 5 8
Year 5 5 9
Year 10 5 9
Year 20 5 9

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $100000000 (Low: $80000000, High: $150000000)

Year 2: $105000000 (Low: $85000000, High: $157000000)

Year 3: $110000000 (Low: $90000000, High: $165000000)

Year 5: $120000000 (Low: $98000000, High: $180000000)

Year 10: $135000000 (Low: $110000000, High: $202000000)

Year 100: $200000000 (Low: $162000000, High: $300000000)

Key Considerations