Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/4060

Bill Overview

Title: Food and Fuel Family Savings Act

Description: This bill allows an individual taxpayer an inflation rebate for the first taxable year beginning in 2022. The amount of such rebate is $600 ($1,200 for joint returns), plus $600 for each of the taxpayer's dependents. The amount of the rebate is reduced for taxpayers whose adjusted gross income exceeds certain levels. The bill imposes a 5% surcharge on individuals whose modified adjusted gross income exceeds $10 million and a 3% surcharge for incomes exceeding $25 million. It also imposes surcharges on certain high income estates and trusts. The bill increases the maximum corporate income tax rate to 26.5% for corporate taxable income exceeding $5 million.

Sponsors: Sen. Reed, Jack [D-RI]

Target Audience

Population: People globally who are subject to income tax regulations

Estimated Size: 158000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Software Developer (Austin, TX)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The rebate would be helpful for managing living expenses, especially childcare costs.
  • I'm not affected by the high-income surcharges, so this policy feels beneficial overall.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 5

Business Owner (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The rebate will be slightly beneficial, but the corporate tax increase could impact future growth plans for the restaurant.
  • Overall, it's a mixed outcome for me.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Investment Banker (New York, NY)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 9

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy has minimal impact on me financially, though I understand its benefits for broader income distribution.
  • I am concerned about potential corporate impacts affecting my professional network.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 9
Year 2 9 9
Year 3 9 9
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Factory Worker (Detroit, MI)

Age: 28 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This rebate makes a big difference in managing our household expenses.
  • Any extra cash helps a lot, and we're grateful for the assistance.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 5 4

Corporate Executive (Miami, FL)

Age: 52 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm unaffected by the rebates but slightly concerned about corporate tax impacts on my industry.
  • It's important to balance personal benefits with national economic health.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

CEO of Tech Company (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 40 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 9

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The surcharge affects my income, but it's manageable and might contribute positively towards economic equality.
  • Interested in seeing how corporate tax changes impact overall industry growth.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 9
Year 2 8 9
Year 3 8 9
Year 5 7 8
Year 10 7 8
Year 20 7 8

Retired (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 70 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • As a retiree, this policy doesn't impact me directly, but I'm glad to see families getting the support they need.
  • I hope it will contribute to overall economic stability.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Public School Teacher (Chicago, IL)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The rebate will help with school supplies and other educational expenses for my kids.
  • I support tax policies aimed at public welfare.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Freelance Writer (Seattle, WA)

Age: 37 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 0.5 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I don't qualify for a rebate, but I'm glad to see support for those who need it more.
  • Policy doesn't affect my personal well-being significantly.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 4
Year 10 4 4
Year 20 4 4

Owner of Marketing Firm (Boston, MA)

Age: 55 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • My business might face slight financial pressure due to the corporate tax increase, impacting future expansions.
  • Personally, the rebates aren't significant, but the surcharge vigilance is crucial.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 8
Year 2 7 8
Year 3 7 8
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 6 7
Year 20 6 7

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $117000000000 (Low: $105300000000, High: $128700000000)

Year 2: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 3: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 5: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations