Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/4015

Bill Overview

Title: TREAT Long COVID Act

Description: This bill requires the Department of Health and Human Services to award competitive grants to create or expand the capacity of clinics that treat patients with persistent, long-term symptoms following recovery from acute COVID-19 (i.e., Long COVID). Eligible recipients include federally qualified health centers, rural health clinics, urban Indian health centers, and state and local health departments.

Sponsors: Sen. Duckworth, Tammy [D-IL]

Target Audience

Population: people with Long COVID

Estimated Size: 20000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Marketing Manager (New York, NY)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I welcome any policy that will increase access to treatment for Long COVID.
  • It's been quite hard finding clinics that have expertise in managing Long COVID symptoms.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 8 5

Software Engineer (Austin, TX)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The lack of specialized clinics has been frustrating.
  • I'm hoping this policy will lead to the opening of more local clinics.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Retired (Rural Kansas)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Access to specialized care would be a godsend.
  • Travel to urban areas for treatment is both costly and exhausting.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 7 4
Year 20 6 4

Student (Chicago, IL)

Age: 28 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm curious if the policy can improve current services.
  • Even mild symptoms can disrupt my life quite a bit.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Chef (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 52 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • More accessible treatment options are desperately needed.
  • Dealing with Long COVID has been affecting my work performance.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Elementary School Teacher (Miami, FL)

Age: 39 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Any improvement in local healthcare can make a huge difference.
  • I'm hopeful that more understanding and targeted treatments will allow me to continue working effectively.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 5

Graphic Designer (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 25 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 6.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Mental health resources would be a fantastic addition.
  • Spreading awareness and understanding is key to recovery.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 5 4

Construction Worker (Raleigh, NC)

Age: 31 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 16/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Access to clinics with more specialized knowledge seems necessary.
  • My work is physically demanding and it's been tough to keep up.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Freelance Writer (Denver, CO)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • More targeted Long COVID treatments would improve my quality of life.
  • Cognitive issues have been particularly crippling for my work.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Retired Veteran (Boise, ID)

Age: 62 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 6.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Better access to specialized clinics through the VA would be greatly appreciated.
  • I'm hoping for improvements that come with more targeted funding.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 5 4
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 5 4

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $800000000 (Low: $600000000, High: $1000000000)

Year 2: $800000000 (Low: $600000000, High: $1000000000)

Year 3: $850000000 (Low: $650000000, High: $1050000000)

Year 5: $900000000 (Low: $700000000, High: $1100000000)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations