Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/3992

Bill Overview

Title: Educators Expense Deduction Modernization Act of 2022

Description: This bill increases the tax deduction for the expenses of eligible educators from $250 to $1,000, An eligible educator is, with respect to any taxable year, an individual who is a kindergarten through grade 12 teacher, instructor, counselor, principal, or aide in a school for at least 900 hours during a school year.

Sponsors: Sen. Brown, Sherrod [D-OH]

Target Audience

Population: Eligible kindergarten to grade 12 school educators

Estimated Size: 4000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

High School Teacher (Austin, TX)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The increase to $1,000 is welcome, as I spend a lot on classroom supplies.
  • It won't solve all financial worries but makes a positive difference.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 5

Elementary School Teacher (Cleveland, OH)

Age: 29 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's a good step, as our salaries rarely cover unexpected costs.
  • I feel more supported by the system with this deduction.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

School Counselor (Denver, CO)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The higher deduction helps, especially when sometimes I purchase materials for student wellness.
  • Every bit helps, but it doesn't change systemic funding issues.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 4

Principal (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 52 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I appreciate the gesture, but principals have different financial strains.
  • My wellbeing is more tied to school performance and funding than personal deductions.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Teacher's Aide (Miami, FL)

Age: 26 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's too early in my career to spend so much on supplies, but it's good to know I have this option.
  • I haven't hit the deduction threshold yet.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 4 4

High School Instrutor (Boston, MA)

Age: 44 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Tax benefits help, but education system's funding issues persist.
  • Small financial relief allows more room for personal debts.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 4

Middle School Instructor (Baton Rouge, LA)

Age: 39 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This supports my frequent need to buy lab supplies.
  • It's reassuring to receive more acknowledgment for personal contributions.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 5

Elementary Music Teacher (Seattle, WA)

Age: 31 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This deduction allows me to invest more in my music programs.
  • More deductions would be even better given the scope of resources needed.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Retired Principal (New York, NY)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Though I am retired, I see how it benefits former colleagues.
  • I wish these changes came sooner during my administrative career.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Assistant Principal (Chicago, IL)

Age: 42 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I believe this measure is more beneficial for teaching staff than administration.
  • System changes often lead to more administrative tasks.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 5 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $660000000 (Low: $490000000, High: $830000000)

Year 2: $660000000 (Low: $490000000, High: $830000000)

Year 3: $660000000 (Low: $490000000, High: $830000000)

Year 5: $660000000 (Low: $490000000, High: $830000000)

Year 10: $660000000 (Low: $490000000, High: $830000000)

Year 100: $660000000 (Low: $490000000, High: $830000000)

Key Considerations