Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/3982

Bill Overview

Title: FREE American Energy Act

Description: This bill generally expedites the review of energy projects, limits executive power over certain energy projects, delegates certain energy permitting authority to states, provides statutory authority for specified environmental rules, and terminates tax credits for certain vehicles.

Sponsors: Sen. Scott, Rick [R-FL]

Target Audience

Population: People impacted by changes in energy and environmental policies

Estimated Size: 335000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Oil and gas engineer (Texas)

Age: 35 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think the policy will streamline processes, which is generally positive for my work.
  • The delegation of permitting authority to states could be a concern if Texas enacts unexpected regulations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Environmental lawyer (California)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy prioritizes energy projects over environmental protection, which is concerning.
  • California might have stricter state regulations, but this could limit federal intervention.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 4 5
Year 2 4 5
Year 3 4 5
Year 5 4 5
Year 10 5 6
Year 20 5 6

State government official (Colorado)

Age: 29 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Our state could benefit from increased state control over energy projects.
  • Reduced federal oversight might allow more flexibility, but also more responsibility.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Automobile sales manager (New York)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Revoking the vehicle tax credits will make it harder to sell certain cars.
  • Customers will reconsider purchases, hitting sales and commissions.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 6
Year 2 5 6
Year 3 5 7
Year 5 5 7
Year 10 6 8
Year 20 7 8

Wind turbine technician (Alaska)

Age: 32 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy seems to sideline renewable projects like mine in favor of fossil fuels.
  • Could impact job security if fossil fuel projects overshadow renewables.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 8
Year 5 7 8
Year 10 7 8
Year 20 8 9

Retiree (Florida)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Without the tax credit, my vehicle's cost would have been unmanageable.
  • I hope states can maintain fair energy prices and keep bills low.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 6
Year 2 5 6
Year 3 5 7
Year 5 5 7
Year 10 6 7
Year 20 7 8

Pipeline maintenance worker (North Dakota)

Age: 41 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Speedier project approvals will help keep my job secure.
  • Shifts in state policy could bring unexpected changes though.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 9 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

College student (Nevada)

Age: 27 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I worry this bill makes environmental jobs harder to come by.
  • State authorities could focus more on energy project jobs than environmental roles.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 6
Year 2 5 6
Year 3 5 6
Year 5 5 6
Year 10 5 7
Year 20 6 7

Customer service representative (Ohio)

Age: 23 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I chose an electric vehicle due to tax credits, without it, I couldn't afford it.
  • Energy policies should focus on lowering costs and encouraging renewables.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 7
Year 2 6 7
Year 3 6 8
Year 5 6 8
Year 10 7 8
Year 20 8 9

Solar panel installer (Washington)

Age: 38 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm concerned that fossil fuel projects will take priority over renewables.
  • Washington's state policies might counterbalance federal changes though.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 9
Year 20 9 9

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $500000000 (Low: $300000000, High: $700000000)

Year 2: $550000000 (Low: $350000000, High: $750000000)

Year 3: $600000000 (Low: $400000000, High: $800000000)

Year 5: $700000000 (Low: $500000000, High: $900000000)

Year 10: $900000000 (Low: $700000000, High: $1100000000)

Year 100: $2000000000 (Low: $1500000000, High: $2500000000)

Key Considerations