Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/3961

Bill Overview

Title: Access to Small Business Investor Capital Act

Description: This bill allows a registered investment company to exclude from the calculation of acquired fund fees and expenses those incurred indirectly from investment in a business development company. Instead, such fees and expenses may be disclosed in a footnote. Acquired fund fees and expenses is a required line item on a fund's fee schedule that provides the operating expenses of the fund.

Sponsors: Sen. Daines, Steve [R-MT]

Target Audience

Population: Investors in registered investment companies and small- and medium-sized businesses benefiting from BDCs

Estimated Size: 2000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Portfolio Manager (New York, NY)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy would simplify our fee reporting process, potentially making our BDC investments more attractive.
  • Understanding fees comprehensively can lead to better investment strategies and decision-making.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 9
Year 20 9 9

Tech Startup Founder (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 32 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Easier access to capital through improved reporting could boost our chances to secure further BDC investments.
  • Our expansion plans hinge on investor confidence, which this policy could positively impact.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 8 8

Small Business Owner (Chicago, IL)

Age: 54 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • BDC funding could be a vital expansion route for us.
  • Red tape and complex fee disclosures are often a hassle, so any streamlining is welcome.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 7

Financial Analyst (Austin, TX)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Clarity in BDC fee structures could simplify my evaluations, aiding better client advice.
  • This policy might steer more clients towards BDC investments, impacting our firm positively.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 8 8

Retiree Investor (Miami, FL)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Anything making BDC investments clearer and potentially cheaper helps me make better investment choices.
  • I rely on transparency to manage my retirement funds.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 6

Consultant (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 41 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Policies that streamline operations can enhance how BDCs operate.
  • More efficient fee disclosures can lead to better strategic planning for clients.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Entrepreneur (Seattle, WA)

Age: 37 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • BDC participation is central to our growth plans; any enhancement in capital access is beneficial.
  • Transparent fee structures could make BDCs more appealing to new investors.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 7

Banking Executive (Boston, MA)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Policy changes that clarify fee reporting directly impact our strategies for recommending BDCs.
  • Could potentially drive up clientele interest in BDC strategies.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 9

Freelance Financial Writer (Portland, OR)

Age: 27 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • New policies change investment advice and product attractiveness, requiring updated content.
  • This act may make BDCs less daunting to new investors, which can be a narrative for my audience.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Independent Investor (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 64 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It’s crucial for me to know where my fees are applied in any investment, especially BDCs.
  • This seems like it might reduce decision complexity, potentially enhancing our club's strategic confidence.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 7

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $2000000 (Low: $1500000, High: $3000000)

Year 2: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 3: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 5: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations