Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/3956

Bill Overview

Title: WIPPES Act

Description: This bill requires the Federal Trade Commission to issue regulations requiring entities responsible for the labeling or retail packaging of certain premoistened, nonwoven wipes (e.g., baby wipes, cleaning wipes, or personal care wipes) to label such products clearly and conspicuously with the phrase Do Not Flush and accompanying symbol as depicted under specified industry guidelines. The commission is authorized to enforce this requirement. Additionally, the Environmental Protection Agency must award competitive grants to states, local or tribal governments, nonprofit organizations, or public-private partnerships to increase community outreach about such labels.

Sponsors: Sen. Merkley, Jeff [D-OR]

Target Audience

Population: People using premoistened, nonwoven wipes

Estimated Size: 300000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Stay-at-home mom (Seattle, WA)

Age: 35 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It seems like a good idea to have clearer instructions on wipes. I wouldn’t want to cause plumbing issues for us by flushing wipes.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Plumber (Houston, TX)

Age: 42 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I hope this stops people from flushing wipes, it will make my job easier!
  • Less blockages means fewer emergency calls and happier customers.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Environmental activist (New York, NY)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Glad to see more attention on environmental impact, but wish it included compostable options as well.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Wastewater treatment facility manager (Lincoln, NE)

Age: 55 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This should reduce the number of issues we face with clogged systems. It’s a step in the right direction.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 9 4

Retail store manager (Chicago, IL)

Age: 30 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Label changes might confuse customers initially, but it’s better for the community in the long run.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Non-profit consultant (Austin, TX)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The grants for educational outreach are crucial to drive local change and awareness.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

College student (Miami, FL)

Age: 23 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 18/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I didn’t even know flushing wipes was a problem. I’ll definitely stop, it’s a simple change to benefit the environment.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 5

Small business owner (Detroit, MI)

Age: 48 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Label changes will increase costs for us in the short term, but it might raise environmental awareness.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Retired engineer (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 67 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Happy to see measures being taken, hope it’s managed well and reaches people effectively.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 8 5

City official (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Our city has been struggling with clogged systems caused by wipes, this policy could save operational costs.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 9 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $80000000 (Low: $77000000, High: $85000000)

Year 2: $80000000 (Low: $77000000, High: $85000000)

Year 3: $80000000 (Low: $77000000, High: $85000000)

Year 5: $80000000 (Low: $77000000, High: $85000000)

Year 10: $80000000 (Low: $77000000, High: $85000000)

Year 100: $80000000 (Low: $77000000, High: $85000000)

Key Considerations