Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/3937

Bill Overview

Title: Home-Based Telemental Health Care Act of 2022

Description: This bill establishes a grant program to fund demonstration projects to provide mental health services to medically underserved individuals in rural areas or in the farming, fishing, and forestry industries. Specifically, the Office for the Advancement of Telehealth within the Health Resources and Services Administration must award grants to public or nonprofit telemental health provider networks to deliver, and evaluate the impact of, home-based telemental services for such individuals. The office must coordinate activities with the Rural Health Liaison of the Department of Agriculture.

Sponsors: Sen. Rounds, Mike [R-SD]

Target Audience

Population: Medically underserved individuals in rural areas or in the farming, fishing, and forestry industries

Estimated Size: 5000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

farmer (rural Iowa)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I find it hard to find time or transportation to see a mental health professional.
  • This program could make it easier to get the help I’ve been needing, especially through the winter months.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 5

fisherman (rural Alabama)

Age: 58 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 3

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I’ve never really thought about getting mental health help, but if it was available at home, maybe I’d try it.
  • There’s a big need here, but a lot of folks would need help understanding how to use the technology first.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 4 3
Year 2 5 3
Year 3 5 3
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 5 3

forestry worker (Northern California)

Age: 34 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I feel the mental stress especially during off-seasons when work isn’t steady.
  • Having regular access to talk to someone could really help during these times.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 4

nurse (Montana)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I’ve seen first-hand how hard it is for my patients to access mental health care.
  • This kind of policy could do a lot of good, if people are aware and willing to try it out.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 8 6

mechanic (Kansas)

Age: 40 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 3

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It’s hard to justify the cost and time to travel for appointments.
  • If this could be done from home, it’d make a big difference for someone like me.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 4 3
Year 2 5 3
Year 3 6 3
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 7 4
Year 20 6 3

farming (West Virginia)

Age: 52 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Many here have always dealt with stress and anxiety without much support.
  • We need more of these programs, but it’s crucial they reach everyone, not just the ones who are tech-savvy.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 5 4
Year 3 5 4
Year 5 5 4
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 4

retired logger (rural Texas)

Age: 61 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 2

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Isolation has increased since I've retired, and I worry about my mental health.
  • This program could help remove some of the barriers I face, especially related to distance.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 3 2
Year 2 4 2
Year 3 4 3
Year 5 5 3
Year 10 5 3
Year 20 5 3

fishing boat captain (Oregon)

Age: 37 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • There are high stress periods when the crew and I are out at sea.
  • Knowing I could have a direct line to mental health support when needed is a relief.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 5

rancher (rural Wyoming)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 3

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The idea sounds good, but I’m not sure how I’d use all this new technology.
  • If there’s support to get us set up, maybe it could help our community.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 4 3
Year 2 4 3
Year 3 4 3
Year 5 5 3
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 4 3

tree farmer (Vermont)

Age: 42 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It’s tough to get help for my husband where we live.
  • This program could be a wonderful opportunity for him to get care more consistently.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 4

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $25000000 (Low: $20000000, High: $30000000)

Year 2: $50000000 (Low: $45000000, High: $55000000)

Year 3: $75000000 (Low: $70000000, High: $80000000)

Year 5: $100000000 (Low: $95000000, High: $105000000)

Year 10: $120000000 (Low: $115000000, High: $125000000)

Year 100: $125000000 (Low: $120000000, High: $130000000)

Key Considerations