Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/3929

Bill Overview

Title: Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Supportive Services Expansion Act

Description: The bill increases funding for and expands the disadvantaged business enterprise supportive services program of the Department of Transportation (DOT). The program provides training, assistance, and services to minority-owned small businesses to help them achieve proficiency to compete, on an equal basis, for federal aid highway project contracts and subcontracts. Specifically, the bill (1) increases the annual funding cap for the program from $10 million to $25 million, and (2) authorizes DOT to implement the program at the Federal Transit Administration and Federal Aviation Administration so that small businesses owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals may achieve proficiency to compete for contracts and subcontracts regarding public transportation and airport projects.

Sponsors: Sen. Padilla, Alex [D-CA]

Target Audience

Population: Socially and economically disadvantaged individuals owning small businesses

Estimated Size: 2000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Owner of a small construction company (Atlanta, Georgia)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy is a great opportunity for my business to expand and gain more federal contracts.
  • It would help us grow and hire more employees, which is something I've been striving for.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 8 7

Owner of a small logistics business (Chicago, Illinois)

Age: 34 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I hope this policy will open the door for new ventures related to airport contract opportunities.
  • Currently, I'm finding it hard to break into federal projects.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 6

Owner of a small tech supply business (San Francisco, California)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • We're already working on a few transportation projects, and this expansion could solidify our growth.
  • Interested to see how the integration with FAA projects will pan out.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Employee in a small landscaping business (Dallas, Texas)

Age: 28 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While I'm not a business owner, my company might gain new contracts, perhaps leading to more stable work.
  • There's a chance this indirectly benefits me if the company grows.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 5 4
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 5

Owner of a medium-sized civil engineering firm (Miami, Florida)

Age: 52 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • We don't qualify as minority-owned, so the direct benefits are limited.
  • However, having more skilled minority partners could enhance project quality overall.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Owner of a small architectural firm (New York, New York)

Age: 39 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 6.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The increase in funding might help us finally win some contracts for local subway station improvements.
  • I hope the additional training can better position us competitively.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 6

Consultant for minority-owned businesses (Los Angeles, California)

Age: 42 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This could drive more clients to seek advice on securing contracts, ultimately growing my consulting business.
  • It's a step forward for minority business empowerment.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 8 7

Retired civil engineer (Houston, Texas)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Retirement means this doesn't directly affect me, but I support any move to create a more level playing field in business.
  • I might consider a consultancy role seeing this interest in minority expansion.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Co-owner of a minority business hub (Phoenix, Arizona)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The potential increase in minority-owned businesses winning contracts will likely increase demand for our services.
  • This is a promising development for the minority entrepreneurship ecosystem.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 9
Year 20 8 8

Owner of a small cleaning business (Detroit, Michigan)

Age: 55 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I see this as an opportunity to expand our client base if we can successfully bid for airport cleaning contracts.
  • My main concern is ensuring we meet the required standards to qualify.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $15000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $20000000)

Year 2: $15000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $20000000)

Year 3: $15000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $20000000)

Year 5: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations