Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/3907

Bill Overview

Title: Find and Protect Foster Youth Act

Description: This bill requires the Office of the Administration for Children & Families to evaluate the protocols that states have developed to comply with the reporting requirements for locating a child missing from foster care. Additionally, the administration, through the Children's Bureau, must provide states, Indian tribes, tribal organizations, and tribal consortia with information, advice, educational materials, and technical assistance relating to eliminating identified obstacles to identifying and responding to children missing from foster care and other vulnerable foster youth and providing such children and youth with effective services.

Sponsors: Sen. Cornyn, John [R-TX]

Target Audience

Population: People in the foster care system globally

Estimated Size: 440000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

High School Student (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 17 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I hope this policy makes it easier to find friends who might go missing.
  • Knowing there is a system to help makes me feel a little safer.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 8 5

Social Worker (Chicago, IL)

Age: 30 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy gives us more tools to assist kids, but we need to ensure the changes really make a difference.
  • Better training and information sharing are key for success.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Foster Parent (Albuquerque, NM)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Any policy that enhances tracking and support for missing kids is beneficial.
  • I hope this policy means more support for families like ours dealing with the stress of missing kids.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Tribal Child Welfare Advocate (Seattle, WA)

Age: 50 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The inclusion of tribal entities is a positive change, but we need more cultural sensitivity.
  • We need resources tailored to our community to make this work.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

College Student (New York, NY)

Age: 22 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • With the right support, missing kids issues can be mitigated.
  • Policies should also consider support for those aging out.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Foster Care Agency Administrator (Austin, TX)

Age: 39 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy could improve communication between agencies.
  • Success depends on effective implementation and constant evaluation.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 9 7

Middle School Student (Miami, FL)

Age: 14 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I want to know that if I or my siblings go missing, someone is looking for us.
  • Policies should make us feel cared for, not just numbers in a system.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 8 5

Retired Police Officer (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy gives law enforcement better frameworks to collaborate with foster agencies.
  • There is a need for real-time data sharing to efficiently locate missing children.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

High School Senior (Denver, CO)

Age: 18 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think the policy helps but what happens after is also important.
  • More resources are needed for kids aging out.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 5

Non-Profit Sector: Child Welfare (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 25 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The new policy is a step towards strengthening the safety net for vulnerable kids.
  • It is crucial to maintain funding for these initiatives beyond the initial years.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 9 8

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $20000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $25000000)

Year 2: $18000000 (Low: $14000000, High: $22000000)

Year 3: $18000000 (Low: $14000000, High: $22000000)

Year 5: $16000000 (Low: $12000000, High: $20000000)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations