Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/3900

Bill Overview

Title: Settlement Agreement Information Database Act of 2022

Description: This bill requires executive agencies to submit information regarding settlement agreements to a public database. Specifically, an agency must submit information regarding any settlement agreement (including a consent decree) entered into by the agency related to an alleged violation of federal law. If an agency determines that information regarding an agreement must remain confidential to protect the public interest, the agency must publish an explanation of why the information is confidential.

Sponsors: Sen. Lankford, James [R-OK]

Target Audience

Population: People involved or interested in settlement agreements with US executive agencies

Estimated Size: 1000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Attorney (Washington, D.C.)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy provides the transparency we have been advocating for a long time.
  • It will enhance our ability to hold government agencies accountable.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Journalist (New York, NY)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This helps the public gain better insights into government actions.
  • It will empower journalists like myself to report more thoroughly.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 5

Business Owner (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 52 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm concerned about the confidentiality aspect, but transparency is usually good for business.
  • Hoping it doesn't mean more bureaucratic red tape.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 4

Public Policy Advocate (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Increased transparency aligns with our goals.
  • We will monitor to ensure it's implemented fairly.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 5

Retired Government Official (Chicago, IL)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Transparency is always a plus, but governments must be cautious about sensitive information.
  • The explanation for confidentiality is a step forward.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Corporate Compliance Officer (Houston, TX)

Age: 40 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This could create more compliance work, but knowing the rules is better than unknown implications from settlements.
  • Companies prefer transparency in regulatory environments.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 4 4

Software Engineer (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 24 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I don't expect this to affect me much personally.
  • Technology could aid in accessing and sorting this information efficiently.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 6 6

Civil Rights Attorney (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 39 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Could be a game changer for holding agencies accountable.
  • We hope for consistent implementation across sectors.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Small Business Owner (Miami, FL)

Age: 31 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Even though this doesn't affect my business directly, understanding policy trends is useful.
  • This might have indirect effects in the business climate.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

University Professor (Seattle, WA)

Age: 50 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • As a framework for academic discourse, this is very rich.
  • Could positively influence curriculum on administrative law.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 7

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $15000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $20000000)

Year 2: $12000000 (Low: $8000000, High: $15000000)

Year 3: $12000000 (Low: $8000000, High: $15000000)

Year 5: $13000000 (Low: $9000000, High: $16000000)

Year 10: $14000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $18000000)

Year 100: $16000000 (Low: $11000000, High: $19000000)

Key Considerations