Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/3862

Bill Overview

Title: ACADEMIC Act

Description: This bill directs the Department of Education (ED) to include an additional longitudinal component in an existing prekindergarten through 12th grade longitudinal educational study. Specifically, ED must include in the study the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on student outcomes and well-being.

Sponsors: Sen. Rubio, Marco [R-FL]

Target Audience

Population: Students impacted by COVID-19 from prekindergarten to 12th grade worldwide

Estimated Size: 50000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

High School Student (New York, NY)

Age: 17 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm glad they're focusing on both academics and well-being. It's been tough to keep up with everything.
  • I hope this data will lead to real changes that help us recover academically.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 8

Middle School Student (Houston, TX)

Age: 14 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm not sure what this will change, but it feels nice to know they're looking out for us.
  • If they provide more support and less pressure, it would be amazing.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Elementary School Student (Chicago, IL)

Age: 9 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 17/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I don't know what the policy is, but I hope we have less homework.
  • I like school, but sometimes it's hard to understand everything since COVID.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

High School Student (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 16 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 6.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's good to see them caring about mental health. It was really stressful last year.
  • I wish we had more conversations with teachers about this.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Middle School Student (Rural Kansas)

Age: 13 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think it's helpful they're looking into how COVID affected us but what's it going to change?
  • Hopefully, they can make schools better prepared for online learning.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 8 7

Elementary School Student (Miami, FL)

Age: 11 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 9

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 18/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • School is fun again, and I see my friends every day.
  • I'm not sure what the policy is, but things seem back to normal.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 9
Year 2 9 9
Year 3 9 9
Year 5 9 9
Year 10 9 9
Year 20 10 10

High School Student (Seattle, WA)

Age: 15 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's important to make sure we're not falling behind because of last year.
  • I'm hoping the policy leads to improved guidance counseling support.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

High School Senior (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 18 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think investigating well-being is key to helping future students.
  • I hope my younger siblings get better mental health support.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 9

High School Student (Denver, CO)

Age: 17 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 9.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Focusing on long-term effects on well-being is crucial after the last couple of years.
  • I really hope it leads to more resources for support in class.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 8

Elementary School Student (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 9 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 19/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I don't really know what policies are, but I love school at the moment.
  • As long as I can keep playing with friends, I'm happy.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 9 9
Year 10 9 9
Year 20 9 9

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $500000000 (Low: $450000000, High: $550000000)

Year 2: $250000000 (Low: $200000000, High: $300000000)

Year 3: $250000000 (Low: $200000000, High: $300000000)

Year 5: $275000000 (Low: $225000000, High: $325000000)

Year 10: $300000000 (Low: $250000000, High: $350000000)

Year 100: $350000000 (Low: $300000000, High: $400000000)

Key Considerations