Bill Overview
Title: SAVE Act of 2022
Description: This bill authorizes the President to make payments to manufacturers to increase supply-chain security if doing so is important to the national defense. The President must submit a strategy to Congress that includes (1) a plan to use authorities under the Defense Production Act of 1950 to ensure the supply of medical materials essential to the national defense; and (2) plans to diversify, and address vulnerabilities in, supply chains for essential medical materials. The President must submit to Congress annual progress reports through FY2025 evaluating the implementation of the strategy.
Sponsors: Sen. Hagerty, Bill [R-TN]
Target Audience
Population: Individuals relying on secure medical material supply chains, including vaccines
Estimated Size: 333000000
- The bill focuses on the production and supply chain security of vaccines and medical materials critical to national defense, impacting all who rely on secure and timely access to these materials, including vaccines.
- A secure supply chain for essential medical materials is crucial for public health, especially during emergencies like pandemics, which affect global populations.
- The bill could influence global vaccine availability by enhancing U.S. production, indirectly benefiting international populations who rely on U.S. vaccine exports.
Reasoning
- The SAVE Act targets vaccine supply chain security, relevant to every U.S. resident due to widespread vaccine use. However, the immediate and visible impact might be larger for those in healthcare, manufacturing, and areas reliant on timely vaccine access, like education sectors and emergency services.
- The policy's $1 billion initial budget and $3.5 billion over a decade indicate a moderate level of investment. This suggests substantial, but not all-encompassing, improvements to supply chains, likely resulting in visible benefits under emergency scenarios like pandemics.
- Implementation will require time due to the complexities of global supply chains and existing dependencies, meaning improvements in personal well-being might be more evident in medium to long-term scales.
Simulated Interviews
Medical Professionals (New York, NY)
Age: 34 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Ensuring a consistent vaccine supply is crucial for our healthcare system.
- Interruptions in supply can cause serious issues, especially during flu seasons or new outbreaks.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 6 |
Factory Worker (Chicago, IL)
Age: 45 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 7.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy could provide stability for my job as demand for medical materials increases.
- Increased production likely means more secure employment.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 5 |
Tech Support Specialist (San Francisco, CA)
Age: 28 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 1.0 years
Commonness: 15/20
Statement of Opinion:
- While I don't work in healthcare, knowing vaccines are secured is reassuring in emergencies.
- The policy seems smart for preparedness, though it doesn't impact my day-to-day life much.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
School Administrator (Dallas, TX)
Age: 55 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy could help maintain vaccination schedules in schools, critical for public safety.
- Supply chain security is vital for consistent vaccination of students.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
Pharmaceutical Sales Representative (Miami, FL)
Age: 40 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 12.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Stabilizing supply chains means more reliable inventory, greatly benefiting my work and commissions.
- It's a boost for business, especially during global disruptions.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 5 |
College Student (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 21 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Peace of mind knowing vaccines are readily available when needed.
- Important as the school's health system sometimes struggles during outbreaks.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Retired (Phoenix, AZ)
Age: 68 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 7.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Ensuring vaccine availability is a relief, given my medical needs.
- Consistency in supply means less hassle getting vaccines when needed.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 5 |
Public Health Official (Boston, MA)
Age: 50 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy underpins vital programs and ensures they continue without supply interruptions.
- Enhancing supply chain security is crucial for public health strategies.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 4 |
Logistics Manager (Seattle, WA)
Age: 39 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 8.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The act can smoothen operations and reduce the risk of supply chain disruptions.
- A more stable flow of materials is beneficial for efficiency.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 5 |
Veterinarian (Houston, TX)
Age: 30 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 11/20
Statement of Opinion:
- While indirect, having a secured human vaccine supply could also benefit animal care in emergency shortages.
- Increased supply could marginally impact stock availability for shared uses.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 8 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $1000000000 (Low: $800000000, High: $1200000000)
Year 2: $1000000000 (Low: $800000000, High: $1200000000)
Year 3: $1000000000 (Low: $800000000, High: $1200000000)
Year 5: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Key Considerations
- The reliance on the Defense Production Act may expedite processes but also involves complex coordination between multiple agencies.
- The potential economic disruptions if supply chain vulnerabilities are not addressed can be considerable.
- The sustainability of increased manufacturing post-policy duration is important for long-term benefits.