Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/3824

Bill Overview

Title: Into the Light for MMH and SUD Act of 2022

Description: This bill reauthorizes through FY2028 a program that addresses maternal depression and, among other changes, expands its scope to include mental health and substance use disorders. It also requires the Department of Health and Human Services to maintain a national hotline to provide mental health and substance use disorder resources to pregnant and postpartum women and their families.

Sponsors: Sen. Gillibrand, Kirsten E. [D-NY]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals affected by maternal mental health and substance use disorders

Estimated Size: 4000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

nurse (Denver, CO)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think this policy is crucial, especially for someone like me who has experienced postpartum depression.
  • Having more resources and a hotline can make early intervention a lot easier.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 8 6

teacher (Raleigh, NC)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's great to see more support for mental health during pregnancy, it's a stressful period.
  • A hotline can provide assurance that help is accessible anytime.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 5

student (Chicago, IL)

Age: 22 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Substance use recovery requires ongoing support, and this act seems to provide it.
  • A national resource hotline could be vital during moments of crisis.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 7 4

mental health counselor (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Policies like this strengthen our ability to help women who need mental health support.
  • Expanded resources mean that as a counselor, I can refer clients to more reliable support networks.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 9 7

stay-at-home father (Austin, TX)

Age: 40 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think this change can support fathers like me to better aid our partners after childbirth.
  • Indirect benefits through better spouse well-being mean a better family environment.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 7

artist (New York, NY)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Although this policy doesn't directly affect me right now, I'm glad mental health isn't overlooked.
  • I might benefit indirectly through better societal understanding and resources.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

software engineer (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Accessing support for partners should be easier with this policy in place.
  • Enhanced resources might lighten the responsibility shared by families.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 6

cashier (New Orleans, LA)

Age: 19 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Having a dedicated hotline and mental health focus is reassuring for low-income individuals like me.
  • Hopefully, it will be accessible without too much bureaucracy.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 4

business owner (Miami, FL)

Age: 38 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This initiative could help maintain recovery by providing consistent mental health resources.
  • It's encouraging to see support outside of traditional medical systems.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 4

retired (Salt Lake City, UT)

Age: 58 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Support for mental health in new mothers will ultimately make family life smoother for everyone involved.
  • Hope the policy extends to resources that grandparents might consult.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 7 8

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $80000000 (Low: $70000000, High: $90000000)

Year 2: $82000000 (Low: $71000000, High: $93000000)

Year 3: $84000000 (Low: $72000000, High: $96000000)

Year 5: $88000000 (Low: $75000000, High: $101000000)

Year 10: $95000000 (Low: $80000000, High: $107000000)

Year 100: $150000000 (Low: $120000000, High: $180000000)

Key Considerations