Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/3816

Bill Overview

Title: Marine Highway Promotion Act

Description: This bill directs the Maritime Administration (MARAD) to establish a United States Marine Highway Program to designate marine highway routes as extensions of the surface transportation system and provide grants and enter into contacts or agreements for marine highway services. In awarding grants or entering into contracts and agreements, MARAD must give preference to marine highway services that present the most financially viable transportation services and require the lowest percentage federal share of the costs. MARAD may also develop strategies to encourage the use of marine highway transportation for the transportation of passengers and cargo.

Sponsors: Sen. Wicker, Roger F. [R-MS]

Target Audience

Population: People involved in maritime and surface transportation systems

Estimated Size: 1500000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Logistics Coordinator (Houston, TX)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm optimistic about the Marine Highway Act because it could streamline cargo operations and reduce congestion on roads. If our company can leverage these new routes, it might lower costs and improve delivery times.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 9 4

Urban Planner (New York, NY)

Age: 32 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Expanding marine highways seems like a smart move to lessen the load on our road networks. In urban planning, it could influence how we design transport systems in water-adjacent cities.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 9 5

Student (Seattle, WA)

Age: 23 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy seems like it might create more job opportunities in marine engineering, which is great for soon-to-be graduates like myself. It might also encourage more innovative projects in waterway transportation.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 9 6

Barge Operator (New Orleans, LA)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm skeptical. The big companies might benefit the most, while smaller operators like me might struggle if we can't compete or secure contracts.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 4
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 6 3
Year 20 6 3

Freight Broker (Savannah, GA)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This Act can bring significant changes to shipping logistics. If the marine routes can cut down road traffic and delays, it might improve our efficiency.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 9 5

Maritime Logistics Consultant (Norfolk, VA)

Age: 39 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The planned improvements and federal support might allow us to enhance supply chain strategies, making U.S. waterways more competitive against road and rail.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 10 6

Retired (Detroit, MI)

Age: 65 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I wonder if this will really help older regions like the Great Lakes. It's promising if MARAD considers diverse water routes across the U.S.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 5 4
Year 3 5 4
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 6 3
Year 20 5 3

Tech Entrepreneur (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 40 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The Marine Highway Act might open new paths for implementing automated and AI-driven shipping solutions. A national focus helps to drive innovation.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 9 4

Environmental Scientist (Portland, OR)

Age: 31 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm concerned about the potential for increased pollution, but if the policy includes environmental safeguards, it could be positive.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 5

Cargo Service Manager (Miami, FL)

Age: 48 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Expanding marine highways could be beneficial if it allows for more cost-efficient shipping options without impacting current service levels.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 9 4

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $25000000 (Low: $20000000, High: $30000000)

Year 2: $25000000 (Low: $20000000, High: $30000000)

Year 3: $26000000 (Low: $21000000, High: $31000000)

Year 5: $27000000 (Low: $22000000, High: $32000000)

Year 10: $30000000 (Low: $25000000, High: $35000000)

Year 100: $60000000 (Low: $50000000, High: $70000000)

Key Considerations