Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/3771

Bill Overview

Title: Stop Russian GOLD Act of 2022

Description: This bill prohibits a U.S. person from engaging in a transaction with a foreign person who purchases, transacts in, or transports Russian gold.

Sponsors: Sen. Cornyn, John [R-TX]

Target Audience

Population: People involved in transactions with Russian gold

Estimated Size: 50000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Investment Banker (New York, NY)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy might enhance scrutiny in gold transactions.
  • I have to review portfolios for any indirect Russian gold exposure.
  • There might be a dip in gold trade efficiency due to increased regulations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 7
Year 2 6 7
Year 3 6 7
Year 5 7 8
Year 10 7 8
Year 20 7 8

Small Business Owner - Jewelry (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 36 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Unclear impact, as major suppliers handle international sourcing.
  • Might see shifts in gold prices; cautious but not worried.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 7
Year 5 6 7
Year 10 6 7
Year 20 6 7

Gold Market Analyst (Chicago, IL)

Age: 29 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Russian gold sanctions could stabilize some political factors.
  • This impacts data trends and requires strategy adjustments.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 9
Year 20 9 9

Retired, Former Precious Metals Trader (Miami, FL)

Age: 54 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 9

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I believe this may stabilize certain market aspects.
  • My exposure is minimal, but I'm monitoring.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 9
Year 2 9 9
Year 3 9 9
Year 5 9 9
Year 10 9 9
Year 20 9 9

Corporate Lawyer (Houston, TX)

Age: 41 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Increased compliance checks will be needed for clients.
  • Potential increased demand for compliance consultancy services.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

University Professor - Economics (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 62 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy could affect research on Russian economic interactions.
  • This adds complexity to existing trade models we evaluate.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 9
Year 20 9 9

Gold Miner Manager (Dallas, TX)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Limited direct impact but potential price fluctuations.
  • Focus will remain on optimizing operations amid sector shifts.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 6 7
Year 20 6 7

Economist (Boston, MA)

Age: 33 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Rich area for research on economic sanctions and their impact.
  • Could shape future sanction policy designs.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 9
Year 20 8 9

Compliance Officer (Seattle, WA)

Age: 46 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy creates more work and complexity in compliance.
  • Expected adaption of regulatory frameworks will occur.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Freelance Writer (Denver, CO)

Age: 25 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Increased content opportunities through policy analysis.
  • Possible shift in readership due to expanded coverage.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $25000000 (Low: $20000000, High: $30000000)

Year 2: $26000000 (Low: $21000000, High: $31000000)

Year 3: $27000000 (Low: $22000000, High: $32000000)

Year 5: $29000000 (Low: $24000000, High: $34000000)

Year 10: $35000000 (Low: $30000000, High: $40000000)

Year 100: $100000000 (Low: $75000000, High: $125000000)

Key Considerations