Bill Overview
Title: Treatment Family Care Services Act
Description: This bill requires the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to issue guidance for states about funding and establishing treatment family care services. Treatment family care services are structured daily services and interventions to address mental and behavioral health disorders, medically fragile conditions, or developmental disabilities that, among other criteria, are provided in a home-based setting to children who are less than 21 years old and enrolled in any Medicaid eligibility group. Specifically, HHS must issue guidance on (1) opportunities for states to fund treatment family care services through Medicaid, federal foster care and related programs, or other HHS programs; and (2) best practices for states to establish treatment family care services programs. The bill also requires the Government Accountability Office to assess and report on certain training provided to foster parents and other caregivers, including recommendations for improving state processes related to approval and oversight of the training.
Sponsors: Sen. Baldwin, Tammy [D-WI]
Target Audience
Population: Children under 21 with mental/behavioral disorders or developmental disabilities
Estimated Size: 2000000
- The bill involves Medicaid services, which primarily impacts low-income individuals and families.
- The target age group for this bill is children under 21 years old.
- It is focused on children with mental and behavioral health disorders, medically fragile conditions, or developmental disabilities.
- The bill ensures these services are delivered in a home-based setting, indicating a focus on children that can benefit from in-home care.
- Medicaid and federal foster care programs are highlighted, which characterize the target population as likely being part of the foster care system.
- Globally, any child under the age of 21 with these conditions in countries with similar support systems could be referenced as having a somewhat similar demographic impact.
Reasoning
- The policy primarily targets children under 21 who are on Medicaid and have mental, behavioral, or developmental challenges. Thus, these children and their families, foster care environments, and other caregivers are the core focus. Given the budget limitations, not all qualifying families may be initially served, particularly those in more populous states.
- The policy aims to deliver services in home-based settings, which implies a shift from institutional to more personalized environments. This may lead to potential improvement in life quality and personal care for the affected children.
- Since the bill also includes an evaluation and improvement of caregiver training, in the long run, caregivers and foster families are anticipated to be better prepared to manage the specific needs of these children, thereby potentially raising their living standards and wellbeing.
- The scope is aimed at reasonably common situations but focuses more intensively on high-need cases within existing federal and state systems.
- Given the US estimate of approximately 2 million affected children, and a budget that allows for only a fraction of this group, equitably scalable solutions will be difficult to implement without additional funding, thus limiting overall impact.
Simulated Interviews
Student (Detroit, Michigan)
Age: 10 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy sounds like it could help my foster parents get me more help, so I might feel better and do better in school.
- I hope this means my foster family will get more training and support.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 5 |
High school student (Jackson, Mississippi)
Age: 16 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 4
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Maybe I can get extra help at home and feel less worried.
- My mom will worry less if we have someone to help with my anxiety.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 4 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Technical college student (San Antonio, Texas)
Age: 19 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Possibly more comprehensive support could help me become more independent.
- Better trained support staff would definitely help me in my daily routine.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
Student (Rural Kansas)
Age: 12 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 3
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I really need daily help. The policy might let us keep me on track better.
- My parents could benefit from some training to understand my needs more.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 3 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 3 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 3 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 4 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 4 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 3 |
High school student (Bronx, New York City)
Age: 15 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 4
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 11/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Maybe treatment at home will make things easier.
- Foster system can be tough; support services would be great.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 4 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 4 |
High school graduate looking for employment (Seattle, Washington)
Age: 18 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Could be useful in dealing with my past traumas.
- Hope this means I can stay at home and not move around so much.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
Student (Suburban Phoenix, Arizona)
Age: 8 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 14/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I like my grandparents taking care of me, not sure what the policy means.
- Grandma says it might help with my homework routine.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Middle school student (Miami, Florida)
Age: 14 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- If they can help manage my diabetes from home, it will make life easier.
- Hopefully, mom and dad get more support too.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Part-time worker (Charleston, West Virginia)
Age: 20 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Continuing at home treatment could stabilize my health.
- Foster family could do with more support and training.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Student (Baltimore, Maryland)
Age: 13 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 4
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy could mean better and more frequent support at home.
- My mother would really appreciate the extra help.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 4 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 4 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $50000000 (Low: $30000000, High: $80000000)
Year 2: $55000000 (Low: $35000000, High: $90000000)
Year 3: $60000000 (Low: $40000000, High: $100000000)
Year 5: $70000000 (Low: $50000000, High: $120000000)
Year 10: $90000000 (Low: $60000000, High: $150000000)
Year 100: $150000000 (Low: $100000000, High: $250000000)
Key Considerations
- The degree of state engagement with the guidance issued will significantly affect costs.
- Variations in Medicaid expansion under different state policies could result in diverse financial impacts.
- Coordination with existing state foster care and Medicaid programs is crucial for implementation.