Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/3761

Bill Overview

Title: Treatment Family Care Services Act

Description: This bill requires the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to issue guidance for states about funding and establishing treatment family care services. Treatment family care services are structured daily services and interventions to address mental and behavioral health disorders, medically fragile conditions, or developmental disabilities that, among other criteria, are provided in a home-based setting to children who are less than 21 years old and enrolled in any Medicaid eligibility group. Specifically, HHS must issue guidance on (1) opportunities for states to fund treatment family care services through Medicaid, federal foster care and related programs, or other HHS programs; and (2) best practices for states to establish treatment family care services programs. The bill also requires the Government Accountability Office to assess and report on certain training provided to foster parents and other caregivers, including recommendations for improving state processes related to approval and oversight of the training.

Sponsors: Sen. Baldwin, Tammy [D-WI]

Target Audience

Population: Children under 21 with mental/behavioral disorders or developmental disabilities

Estimated Size: 2000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Student (Detroit, Michigan)

Age: 10 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy sounds like it could help my foster parents get me more help, so I might feel better and do better in school.
  • I hope this means my foster family will get more training and support.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 8 5

High school student (Jackson, Mississippi)

Age: 16 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Maybe I can get extra help at home and feel less worried.
  • My mom will worry less if we have someone to help with my anxiety.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

Technical college student (San Antonio, Texas)

Age: 19 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Possibly more comprehensive support could help me become more independent.
  • Better trained support staff would definitely help me in my daily routine.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 8 6

Student (Rural Kansas)

Age: 12 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 3

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I really need daily help. The policy might let us keep me on track better.
  • My parents could benefit from some training to understand my needs more.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 3
Year 2 6 3
Year 3 7 3
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 7 3

High school student (Bronx, New York City)

Age: 15 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Maybe treatment at home will make things easier.
  • Foster system can be tough; support services would be great.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 4

High school graduate looking for employment (Seattle, Washington)

Age: 18 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Could be useful in dealing with my past traumas.
  • Hope this means I can stay at home and not move around so much.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 5

Student (Suburban Phoenix, Arizona)

Age: 8 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I like my grandparents taking care of me, not sure what the policy means.
  • Grandma says it might help with my homework routine.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 7

Middle school student (Miami, Florida)

Age: 14 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • If they can help manage my diabetes from home, it will make life easier.
  • Hopefully, mom and dad get more support too.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 5

Part-time worker (Charleston, West Virginia)

Age: 20 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Continuing at home treatment could stabilize my health.
  • Foster family could do with more support and training.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 5

Student (Baltimore, Maryland)

Age: 13 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy could mean better and more frequent support at home.
  • My mother would really appreciate the extra help.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 4

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $50000000 (Low: $30000000, High: $80000000)

Year 2: $55000000 (Low: $35000000, High: $90000000)

Year 3: $60000000 (Low: $40000000, High: $100000000)

Year 5: $70000000 (Low: $50000000, High: $120000000)

Year 10: $90000000 (Low: $60000000, High: $150000000)

Year 100: $150000000 (Low: $100000000, High: $250000000)

Key Considerations