Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/3758

Bill Overview

Title: SAFE SEX Workers Study Act

Description: This bill requires the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) to study the impacts of the reduction in access to certain websites and other interactive computer services resulting from the Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act of 2017 on individuals engaged in adult, consensual sex work. Specifically, HHS must study the impacts of the reduction on the health and safety of individuals engaged in transactional sex while DOJ must study the impacts of the reduction on human trafficking investigations and prosecutions.

Sponsors: Sen. Warren, Elizabeth [D-MA]

Target Audience

Population: People engaged in adult, consensual sex work

Estimated Size: 80000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Sex Worker (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The loss of online platforms forced me to work more on the streets, which feels less safe.
  • I hope this study highlights the pressures we face due to legal changes.
  • Without the internet, finding clients is riskier and more difficult.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 8 5
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 8 7

Sex Worker (New York, NY)

Age: 42 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The crackdown has led to more dangerous client meetups.
  • I am hoping for more safety measures and legal protections after the study.
  • My network completely shattered post-SESTA/FOSTA.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Former Sex Worker (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 35 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I don't engage in sex work now, but I see my peers struggling more post-crackdown.
  • The study should account for both current and former workers to assess long-term impacts.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 9
Year 20 9 9

University Student (Dallas, TX)

Age: 23 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I turned to sex work after tuition increased.
  • SESTA/FOSTA made it harder to find trustworthy clients.
  • Balancing safety and financial needs is challenging.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Independent Escort (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 31 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I felt safer behind my computer screen.
  • The policy's study might help regain some online safety measures.
  • It's not just working, it's providing for my kid.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Police Officer (Chicago, IL)

Age: 38 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While SESTA/FOSTA intends to protect, it complicates policing.
  • Understanding its actual effect on sex work can adjust our approach.
  • Human trafficking links are complex.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 9 9
Year 20 9 9

Social Worker (Seattle, WA)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • SESTA/FOSTA has created more issues than solutions.
  • We keep seeing worsened mental health and more isolation among my clients.
  • Hoping for comprehensive insights from the study.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Dancer (Miami, FL)

Age: 27 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Online shifts have made supplemental work harder to find.
  • Income volatility has increased, breaking previous steadiness.
  • A return to digital space would be helpful.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Client (Houston, TX)

Age: 54 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm worried the law incites unsafe practices inadvertently.
  • It's not just about the workers, but those of us who also seek companionship.
  • The ripple effects of restricting communication are real.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Agency Owner (Las Vegas, NV)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Regulations have shrunk worker pool, impacting my agency.
  • I hope this study shows the need for balanced industry regulation.
  • Both workers and clients are affected in different ways.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $8000000 (Low: $5000000, High: $10000000)

Year 2: $8000000 (Low: $5000000, High: $10000000)

Year 3: $8000000 (Low: $5000000, High: $10000000)

Year 5: $4000000 (Low: $2000000, High: $6000000)

Year 10: $1000000 (Low: $500000, High: $2000000)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations