Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/3737

Bill Overview

Title: Promoting Public Health Information Act

Description: This bill sets out programs and activities to support the communication and dissemination of evidence-based public health information, with a particular focus on communication during public health emergencies. Specifically, it temporarily establishes an advisory committee to report on and make recommendations about, for example, the role and impact of misinformation on responses to public health emergencies and strategies to improve communication during such emergencies. The committee terminates four years after the bill's enactment. Additionally, the Department of Health and Human Services must support the development of initiatives that promote fact-based public health and medical information to the public and educate the public on identifying misinformation.

Sponsors: Sen. Murphy, Christopher [D-CT]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals globally relying on public health information during emergencies

Estimated Size: 331000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Teacher (New York, NY)

Age: 35 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy is a step in the right direction especially after COVID-19. Inaccurate information affected a lot of people.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Freelancer (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 24 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I doubt this bill will have much effect. Misinformation spreads too quickly online.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 5 4

Healthcare Worker (Austin, TX)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This could make my job easier by reducing misinformation but needs strong follow-through.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 6

Retired (Rural Montana)

Age: 64 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I hope this means I'll get clearer information on the radio at least.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Tech Startup Worker (Chicago, IL)

Age: 29 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think it’s great that there’s acknowledgment of misinformation issues, but four years isn’t enough for true change.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 6

Healthcare Policy Analyst (Miami, FL)

Age: 40 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The temporary advisory committee can identify problems but long term strategies are essential.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 6

Business Owner (Portland, OR)

Age: 58 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I don’t pay too much attention to such programs, but anything reducing misinformation helps.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 5

University Student (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 21 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Effective public health communication is crucial but only if it keeps pace with tech.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 5

Software Engineer (Boston, MA)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Misinformation is a big issue, but we need better tech solutions to make a big impact.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 6

Nurse (Houston, TX)

Age: 32 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy might cut down misinformation, helping us get more people vaccinated.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 7

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $50000000 (Low: $30000000, High: $80000000)

Year 2: $52000000 (Low: $31000000, High: $85000000)

Year 3: $54000000 (Low: $32000000, High: $89000000)

Year 5: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations