Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/3700

Bill Overview

Title: Affordable Insulin Now Act

Description: This bill limits cost-sharing for insulin under private health insurance and the Medicare prescription drug benefit. Specifically, the bill caps cost-sharing under private health insurance for a month's supply of selected insulin products at $35 or 25% of a plan's negotiated price (after any price concessions), whichever is less, beginning in 2023. The bill caps cost-sharing under the Medicare prescription drug benefit for a month's supply of covered insulin products at (1) $35 between October 1, 2022, and January 1, 2024; and (2) $35 or 25% of a plan's negotiated price, whichever is less, beginning in 2024. The bill provides funds for FY2022 for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to implement the bill. Currently, the CMS is testing a voluntary model under the Medicare prescription drug benefit (the Part D Senior Savings Model) in which the copayment for a month's supply of insulin is capped at $35 through participating plans. The model is set to expire on December 31, 2025.

Sponsors: Sen. Warnock, Raphael G. [D-GA]

Target Audience

Population: People with diabetes requiring insulin

Estimated Size: 10700000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Retired teacher (Florida)

Age: 68 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy would make it a lot easier for me to afford my insulin. Right now, I sometimes have to choose between buying my full prescription and other necessities.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 5

Truck driver (Texas)

Age: 52 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Even though I have insurance, it sometimes feels like I'm drowning in medical bills. This cap would be a relief.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 8 4

Software engineer (California)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy sounds great for those who need it, but it won't affect me as long as I don't need insulin.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Artist (New York)

Age: 40 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 3

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy would take a huge weight off my shoulders. I've had to ration insulin before, which is frightening.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 3
Year 2 5 3
Year 3 5 3
Year 5 5 3
Year 10 5 3
Year 20 4 3

Retired factory worker (Ohio)

Age: 75 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I worry less about the cost of my insulin, which means I can focus more on my diet and exercise to stay healthy.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 5 4
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 7 4
Year 20 7 4

Small business owner (Illinois)

Age: 35 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It would help during lean months when business isn't great, less worry about my health expenses.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 7 6

Graduate student (New Jersey)

Age: 24 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This would make managing my expenses as a student much easier. Balancing rent, tuition, and health costs is tough.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 8 5

Public school teacher (Colorado)

Age: 47 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • My insurance already covers my insulin costs reasonably well, so I wouldn't see much change.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

CEO of a non-profit (Massachusetts)

Age: 57 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Though useful for many, this policy won't personally affect me until I require insulin.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Retired mechanic (Mississippi)

Age: 61 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm glad for more predictable costs. It eases the pressure of budgeting on a fixed income.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 8 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $4500000000 (Low: $4000000000, High: $5000000000)

Year 2: $4700000000 (Low: $4200000000, High: $5200000000)

Year 3: $4900000000 (Low: $4400000000, High: $5400000000)

Year 5: $5200000000 (Low: $4700000000, High: $5700000000)

Year 10: $6000000000 (Low: $5400000000, High: $6600000000)

Year 100: $7000000000 (Low: $6300000000, High: $7700000000)

Key Considerations