Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/3667

Bill Overview

Title: African-American Burial Grounds Preservation Act

Description: This bill directs the Department of the Interior to establish the United States African-American Burial Grounds Preservation Program within the National Park Service. In carrying out the program, Interior may make grants to other federal agencies; state, local, and tribal governments; other public entities; educational institutions; historic preservation groups; and private nonprofit organizations for the identification of historic African-American burial grounds, the preservation and restoration of African-American burial grounds, the interpretation of African-American burial grounds, and related research and documentation for historic African-American burial grounds.

Sponsors: Sen. Brown, Sherrod [D-OH]

Target Audience

Population: descendants of individuals interred in historic African-American burial grounds, researchers, historians, and heritage communities

Estimated Size: 3000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

retired school teacher (Savannah, Georgia)

Age: 55 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think this policy could finally bring some recognition and preservation to the burial grounds near me that have been neglected for so long.
  • This preservation could help educate the younger generation about our local history and cultural legacy.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 9 4

historian specializing in African-American history (Washington D.C.)

Age: 34 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy could enhance my research opportunities and provide funds to preserve more sites, adding depth to our understanding of African-American history.
  • While the funding is limited, it could lead to significant discoveries and documentation efforts.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 5

graduate student in anthropology (Chicago, Illinois)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The passage of this policy could open new avenues for my thesis research, providing access to resources and initiatives I wouldn't have otherwise.
  • I hope it leads to more internships and educational opportunities at sites recognized for protection.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 4

owner of a local heritage tour company (Richmond, Virginia)

Age: 62 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy might lead to increased interest in heritage tours, as well-preserved sites attract tourists.
  • However, in practice, the impact depends on how funds are allocated regionally.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 4

city planner (Houston, Texas)

Age: 40 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy could potentially ease some of the push for redevelopment of burial ground sites, allowing for better cultural preservation.
  • However, my concern is whether the funding will address all the necessary administrative barriers.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 5

high school history teacher (New Orleans, Louisiana)

Age: 47 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Having access to these preserved sites would enrich the teaching materials and offer field trip opportunities for students.
  • While the funding is promising, local implementation is key to seeing real benefits in education.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 9 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 8 6

retired historian (Birmingham, Alabama)

Age: 70 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's encouraging to see a formal program for such important sites, but I worry about whether the funds are adequate given the number of burial grounds needing attention.
  • As someone who has campaigned for this type of preservation, I hope the program is executed effectively with local input.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 10 8
Year 5 10 7
Year 10 10 7
Year 20 9 6

librarian (Jackson, Mississippi)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This bill could complement the local efforts to document and share knowledge about African-American burial sites that have been forgotten.
  • I'm hopeful that additional funding might allow for more community engagement and exhibitions.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 5

environmental scientist (Los Angeles, California)

Age: 29 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While this policy isn't directly related to my work, I see the value in preserving cultural heritage as part of maintaining community identity.
  • I hope it inspires similar preservation efforts in other minority communities and environmental contexts.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

artist (Charleston, South Carolina)

Age: 38 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm optimistic about the potential for new inspiration and materials from preserved sites which can enhance the narrative of my art.
  • However, much depends on whether this policy truly reaches grassroots level and involves artists.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $5000000 (Low: $4000000, High: $6000000)

Year 2: $5000000 (Low: $4000000, High: $6000000)

Year 3: $5000000 (Low: $4000000, High: $6000000)

Year 5: $5000000 (Low: $4000000, High: $6000000)

Year 10: $5000000 (Low: $4000000, High: $6000000)

Year 100: $5000000 (Low: $4000000, High: $6000000)

Key Considerations