Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/3652

Bill Overview

Title: Never Yielding Europe’s Territory (NYET) Act of 2022

Description: This bill addresses Russia's actions against Ukraine and other countries in the region. The bill authorizes and expedites the provision of security assistance, including by (1) prioritizing delivering excess defense articles to Ukraine, (2) authorizing the Department of State to waive certain costs for defense articles leased to Ukraine, and (3) authorizing additional Foreign Military Financing for programs in Europe. The bill also provides funding for (1) Foreign Military Financing assistance to Ukraine, (2) the Global Engagement Center to counter foreign-sponsored propaganda and disinformation, (3) the Countering Russian Influence Fund to support Ukraine and other countries in response to Russia's aggression, and (4) International Military Education and Training assistance for Ukraine. Furthermore, the bill imposes sanctions, including on (1) senior Russian military officials responsible for planning or executing military operations that violated Ukraine's sovereignty or territorial integrity, and (2) foreign individuals or entities that acted on behalf of Russia's government to destabilize Ukraine or disrupt Ukraine's critical infrastructure. The bill also addresses additional matters, including (1) authorizing Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty to explore opening new bureaus to reach audiences on Russia's periphery; and (2) providing for expedited approval of natural gas exports to qualifying nations, including NATO members, whereas currently expedited approval is only available for exports to countries that are in a free trade agreement relating to natural gas with the United States.

Sponsors: Sen. Risch, James E. [R-ID]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals in Eastern Europe, Ukraine, Russia, and other EU territories affected by geopolitical and economic shifts

Estimated Size: 20000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Foreign Policy Analyst (Washington, D.C.)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy is crucial for maintaining security in Eastern Europe and reassuring allies against Russian aggression.
  • I believe it will enhance the strategic presence of the US in Europe, supporting democracy and stability.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 8 5

Energy Sector Manager (Houston, Texas)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy should benefit the US energy sector by opening more markets for export, which is positive for business.
  • However, geopolitical tensions are a concern for market stability.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 8 7

Journalist (New York, NY)

Age: 33 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Enhanced military support to Ukraine is necessary for maintaining regional stability.
  • The support for media outlets like Radio Free Europe is critical to counter disinformation.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 5
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 7 4

College Professor (Chicago, Illinois)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The NYET Act is a positive move towards confronting Russia's aggressive actions in Eastern Europe.
  • Education and training initiatives for Ukraine are especially beneficial.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 9 7
Year 3 9 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 8 5

Retired Military Officer (San Francisco, California)

Age: 62 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • A strong defense posture sends a clear message to Russia and supports allies.
  • Ensuring military and economic stability in Europe aligns with US security interests.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 8
Year 2 9 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 9 5

Software Engineer (Seattle, Washington)

Age: 37 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The focus on countering misinformation is very important, but cybersecurity measures could be emphasized further.
  • I worry about increasing tensions between global powers.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 5 4

Student (Miami, Florida)

Age: 23 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy seems necessary to deter further aggression by Russia and supports democratic partners.
  • The policy can also serve as an educational opportunity to understand global alliances.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 5 4

Marketing Executive (Los Angeles, California)

Age: 40 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I feel relieved knowing there is increased support for Ukraine against Russian threats.
  • Maintaining business relationships in Eastern Europe is also important for the US economy.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 5

NGO Director (Boston, Massachusetts)

Age: 55 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy provides much-needed resources for protection of civil society and democratic governance in Ukraine.
  • Sanctions could also pressurize key players to rethink their strategies.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 9 6
Year 5 9 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Economist (Dallas, Texas)

Age: 47 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Sanctions could have mixed effects; they might curb aggressive actions but could disrupt trade conditions.
  • The policy needs to ensure it doesn't adversely affect global economic stability.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 4

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $1500000000 (Low: $1200000000, High: $1800000000)

Year 2: $1500000000 (Low: $1200000000, High: $1800000000)

Year 3: $1500000000 (Low: $1200000000, High: $1800000000)

Year 5: $1500000000 (Low: $1200000000, High: $1800000000)

Year 10: $1500000000 (Low: $1200000000, High: $1800000000)

Year 100: $1500000000 (Low: $1200000000, High: $1800000000)

Key Considerations