Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/3633

Bill Overview

Title: A bill to extend the authorizations for the Augusta Canal National Heritage Area, Arabia Mountain National Heritage Area, and Gullah/Geechee Cultural Heritage Corridor, and for other purposes.

Description: This bill reauthorizes through FY2036 and otherwise modifies the Augusta Canal and Arabia Mountain National Heritage Areas. It also extends the Gullah/Geechee Cultural Heritage Corridor Commission for another 15 years. Specifically, the bill repeals the maximum total amount that may be provided for the Augusta Canal National Heritage Area, the Arabia Mountain National Heritage Area, and the Gullah/Geechee Cultural Heritage Corridor and adjusts the boundary of the Arabia Mountain National Heritage Area to include approximately 188 acres of additional land.

Sponsors: Sen. Warnock, Raphael G. [D-GA]

Target Audience

Population: People impacted by National Heritage Areas legislation

Estimated Size: 2000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Local tour guide (Augusta, Georgia)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think the increased funding will help bring more tourists. It reassures us that the area will be maintained better and could lead to more business.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 8 6

State government official (Atlanta, Georgia)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy ensures continued efforts in conservation and tourism promotion which are vital for local economies and preserving cultural sites.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 7 3

Gullah cultural ambassador (Charleston, South Carolina)

Age: 28 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Extension of the commission means our culture has a chance to be even more preserved and celebrated. It's a good opportunity to reach the younger generation.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 5
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 8 4

Retired (Savannah, Georgia)

Age: 65 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While I am not directly involved with the sites, I believe they're important to the community and it's great to see their future secured.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 5

Cultural events organizer (Raleigh, North Carolina)

Age: 40 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Direct impact might be minimal for me, but it's good to see such initiatives being supported. It's essential for the cultural richness of the region.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 5 3

Small business owner (Macon, Georgia)

Age: 55 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Heritage tourism keeps people coming into my cafe, so more funding to keep these places nice is only going to help.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 4
Year 20 8 3

Historian (Brunswick, Georgia)

Age: 47 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's vital for keeping histories alive. This support can facilitate further research and education efforts.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 9 7
Year 3 9 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 8 4

Tourist (Miami, Florida)

Age: 36 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I appreciate knowing these places are receiving attention, it enriches my travel experiences.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 5 3

Environmental activist (Atlanta, Georgia)

Age: 43 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The environmental benefits from such focused support can be long-lasting, improving our regional ecosystems.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 6
Year 5 9 5
Year 10 10 5
Year 20 9 4

Retired veteran (Orlando, Florida)

Age: 62 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Preserving culture is very important, and I think it's wonderful that there's more effort towards this. It's enriching.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 4

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $3500000 (Low: $3000000, High: $4000000)

Year 2: $3600000 (Low: $3100000, High: $4100000)

Year 3: $3700000 (Low: $3200000, High: $4200000)

Year 5: $3800000 (Low: $3300000, High: $4300000)

Year 10: $4000000 (Low: $3500000, High: $4500000)

Year 100: $4500000 (Low: $4000000, High: $5000000)

Key Considerations