Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/3592

Bill Overview

Title: Firefighter Staffing and Support Act

Description: This bill provides additional funding for firefighter staffing and safety grants. Specifically, the bill increases funding levels for FY2023 and sets a formula for funding for FY2024-FY2028 under the Assistance to Firefighters Grants and Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response grants programs, including for technical assistance. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the U.S. Fire Administration must submit to Congress and make publicly available reports on (1) plans to improve the grant application process to ease access to such grant funds; and (2) the challenges specific to rural and volunteer fire departments, including an action plan to address such challenges. The bill also provides protections for volunteer firefighters. An employer may not terminate, demote, or discriminate against a volunteer firefighter for providing emergency services as part of a response to an emergency or major disaster.

Sponsors: Sen. Sanders, Bernard [I-VT]

Target Audience

Population: People who rely on fire and emergency services

Estimated Size: 332000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Career Firefighter (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The increased funding means we might get better equipment and more manpower.
  • It feels good to see the government taking our safety seriously.
  • I hope the grant process becomes simpler as promised—it can be a hassle.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 7 6

Volunteer Firefighter (Rural Nebraska)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The new protections will help balance my volunteering with my job.
  • I hope they address our equipment shortages with this funding.
  • This policy recognizes our contributions in rural areas.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 7 5

Nurse (New York, NY)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I trust the fire department to do their job, so this policy is more about peace of mind for me.
  • It's nice knowing they might be better equipped now.
  • I doubt it changes my day-to-day life directly.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 6

Volunteer Firefighter (Rural Texas)

Age: 34 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • We need more training equipment and funds could help.
  • I am worried less about losing my job when I serve.
  • Rural stations are often forgotten, so this is great news.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 6 4

School Teacher (Boston, MA)

Age: 40 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I always teach my students the importance of fire safety.
  • I trust the professionals to handle crisis situations efficiently.
  • This doesn't change how I interact with emergency services.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 5

Retired (Miami, FL)

Age: 62 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's important that emergency services are well-funded.
  • This will hopefully improve the speed of response in emergencies.
  • I feel safer knowing firefighters are well-supported.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 6 5

Fire Chief (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy could mean more resources for our team.
  • Easing the grant process is a bureaucratic relief.
  • Urban departments also benefit from improved training.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 9 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 8 5

Paramedic (Chicago, IL)

Age: 24 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Knowing firefighters are supported helps us do our job.
  • My safety in emergencies partly depends on them.
  • Uniform firefighter training will help us coordinate better.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 7 6

Volunteer Firefighter (Seattle, WA)

Age: 38 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm excited for the new protections in this policy.
  • Better resources will benefit everyone on the team.
  • Our community will be safer with these improvements.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 4

Local Government Official (Denver, CO)

Age: 55 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Securing funding for firefighting is a priority at the city level too.
  • This federal support will relieve some financial pressure locally.
  • We can focus more on other safety and health priorities.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 8 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $2000000000 (Low: $1800000000, High: $2200000000)

Year 2: $2100000000 (Low: $1900000000, High: $2300000000)

Year 3: $2200000000 (Low: $2000000000, High: $2400000000)

Year 5: $2400000000 (Low: $2100000000, High: $2600000000)

Year 10: $2700000000 (Low: $2400000000, High: $3000000000)

Year 100: $3000000000 (Low: $2700000000, High: $3300000000)

Key Considerations