Bill Overview
Title: Prohibiting the Use of Arrest Warrants for Identification at Security Checkpoints Act of 2022
Description: This bill prohibits the use of warrants for the arrest, removal, or deportation of an alien as proof of identity at an airport security checkpoint unless the alien is being removed from the United States pursuant to immigration laws.
Sponsors: Sen. Portman, Rob [R-OH]
Target Audience
Population: Individuals traveling by air who use arrest warrants for identification
Estimated Size: 1100000
- The bill specifically addresses the use of arrest warrants for identification purposes at airport security checkpoints.
- It targets the population of individuals who use airports and would require proof of identity to pass through security checkpoints.
- The specific group mentioned are aliens who might have an arrest warrant for arrest, removal, or deportation.
- The global impact would primarily concern international travelers and undocumented individuals who travel by air and are present in countries implementing similar laws.
Reasoning
- This policy primarily affects non-citizens who might use arrest warrants as identification at airports in the U.S.
- The impact will vary depending on individuals' reliance on such identification for travel.
- Not everyone in the population will be directly affected since most people use traditional forms of ID like passports or drivers licenses.
- Non-citizens with arrest or deportation warrants will be unable to use them as IDs under this policy, potentially impacting their travel plans.
- The policy's implementation cost needs to consider enforcement and public awareness raising at airports.
- The policy aims to tighten security protocols and might face resistance or support depending on individual perspectives.
Simulated Interviews
restaurant worker (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 27 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I used to fly to visit family within the US using my warrant as ID when no other option was available.
- I am worried I won't be able to visit family in emergencies now.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 3 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 3 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 3 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 2 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 3 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 3 | 6 |
construction worker (Miami, FL)
Age: 35 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 15/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I know people who used warrants to fly, they are now more nervous.
- I personally use my green card, but I see people facing issues with travel.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
immigration lawyer (New York, NY)
Age: 42 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy makes travel harder for my clients who need to see family or for emergencies.
- It adds another layer of stress to an already difficult situation.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 5 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 5 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 7 |
software engineer (Houston, TX)
Age: 30 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 9
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 17/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy doesn't really affect me directly, as I use my passport.
- I support any measures that improve security and reduce misuse of identification.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 2 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 9 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 9 |
graduate student (San Francisco, CA)
Age: 24 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 14/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I have many international friends and this policy might make things harder for them.
- While I have my passport and visa, I am concerned about fairness.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 8 |
small business owner (Chicago, IL)
Age: 50 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This decision could hurt the community's ability to travel safely.
- Many people depend on whatever ID they have to move around.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 8 |
nurse (Phoenix, AZ)
Age: 38 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 16/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I believe it's important to have proper ID, but we should help those who struggle to obtain it.
- People should be allowed to visit family for compassionate reasons.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 8 |
airport security personnel (Atlanta, GA)
Age: 46 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 13/20
Statement of Opinion:
- From a security standpoint, this helps prevent potential fraud.
- It's our job to ensure safe travel but compassion should align with policy.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
retiree (Washington, DC)
Age: 60 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I think this is unfair and punitive towards those lacking options.
- We should support and find alternatives for identification.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 5 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 5 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 7 |
freelancer (Boston, MA)
Age: 28 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 11/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I support progressive security policies, but we must balance safety with equality.
- This seems to disproportionately affect vulnerable groups.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 8 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $2500000 (Low: $1000000, High: $5000000)
Year 2: $500000 (Low: $250000, High: $1000000)
Year 3: $300000 (Low: $100000, High: $700000)
Year 5: $100000 (Low: $50000, High: $300000)
Year 10: $100000 (Low: $50000, High: $300000)
Year 100: $100000 (Low: $50000, High: $300000)
Key Considerations
- The bill affects only a specific subset of travelers and does not have far-reaching fiscal implications.
- The potential increase in administrative procedures at checkpoints due to this change is minimal.