Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/3561

Bill Overview

Title: Housing Temperature Safety Act of 2022

Description: This bill requires owners of certain federally assisted rental dwelling units to install temperature sensors in those units within a year after the bill is enacted. The bill also requires those owners to record the temperature in those units at least six times each day and to report that information to the Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Sponsors: Sen. Gillibrand, Kirsten E. [D-NY]

Target Audience

Population: People living in federally assisted rental housing in the United States.

Estimated Size: 12000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Retail Worker (New York City, NY)

Age: 32 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think it's a good idea. Sometimes, it gets really cold in winter and hot in summer, and it can get uncomfortable or even dangerous.
  • I'm a bit worried about privacy with all this tracking. Who will see this data?

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 8 5

Retired (Chicago, IL)

Age: 78 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 18/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy will help keep me safe, especially during the cold Chicago winters.
  • I hope it also helps reduce my heating bill in some way.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 7 3
Year 10 7 3
Year 20 6 3

Nurse (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • In LA, weather is mostly nice, but knowing that my rent is federally assisted means I might see some cost benefits from this monitoring.
  • It's good for the overall system but won't change things much for me immediately.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Construction Worker (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Having the temperature monitored means we'll know right away if something is wrong. That should make summers more bearable.
  • I hope they also upgrade our air conditioning units to something more efficient.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Part-Time Retail Associate (Miami, FL)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's reassuring to know that temperatures will be monitored, especially if there are power outages during storms.
  • Privacy is a little bit of a concern, but safety is more important.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Manufacturing Worker (Detroit, MI)

Age: 40 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm not sure how much this will really affect us unless they improve insulation or heating systems too.
  • Having that data might help advocate for better living conditions.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 7 5

Daycare Worker (Houston, TX)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 17/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • With kids in the house, it's so important to stay on top of things if there's an issue.
  • I'm hoping there will be emergency protocols if it gets too hot or cold.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 7 4

Artist (Seattle, WA)

Age: 55 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Seattle weather is pretty moderate, so I don't see this changing much in my daily life.
  • It's more of a peace of mind thing.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Student (Newark, NJ)

Age: 23 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think monitoring is good, but I hope it goes hand in hand with energy-saving measures/rules.
  • Interested in seeing the data, as it could help push for more sustainable practices.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 9 6

Retired (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 64 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 20/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm grateful for anything that will help keep my apartment comfortable and safe.
  • I hope they will be prompt in fixing any discovered issues.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 8 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $690000000 (Low: $510000000, High: $920000000)

Year 2: $276000000 (Low: $253000000, High: $299000000)

Year 3: $276000000 (Low: $253000000, High: $299000000)

Year 5: $276000000 (Low: $253000000, High: $299000000)

Year 10: $276000000 (Low: $253000000, High: $299000000)

Year 100: $276000000 (Low: $253000000, High: $299000000)

Key Considerations