Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/3548

Bill Overview

Title: Veterans Hearing Benefits Act of 2022

Description: This bill provides a presumption of service-connection for hearing-related issues in certain veterans for purposes of wartime disability compensation. Under a presumption of service-connection, specific conditions diagnosed in certain veterans are presumed to have been caused by the circumstances of their military service. Health care benefits and disability compensation may then be awarded. Per the bill, certain veterans with diagnosed hearing loss, tinnitus, or both shall be presumed to have incurred or aggravated such conditions during active military, naval, or air service. This bill applies to veterans who (1) served in combat, or (2) were assigned to a military occupational specialty that likely exposed them to a sufficiently high level of acoustic trauma. The bill also requires the Department of Veterans Affairs to adjust the schedule of rating disabilities to establish a minimum disability rating for a veteran who requires a hearing aid because of a service-connected disability.

Sponsors: Sen. Smith, Tina [D-MN]

Target Audience

Population: Veterans with hearing-related disabilities

Estimated Size: 2700000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Retired (Houston, TX)

Age: 66 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I've struggled with my hearing for decades after my service.
  • This policy could finally provide the support I need to afford better hearing aids.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 4
Year 2 7 4
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 8 3
Year 10 8 3
Year 20 8 3

Retired engineer (Tampa, FL)

Age: 72 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's been tough dealing with the constant ringing in my ears.
  • This bill might mean I can finally seek the relief I've been needing.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 8 5

Veteran Affairs counselor (San Diego, CA)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I see the struggles veterans face firsthand.
  • This policy could be a game-changer for many of the people I assist.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Logistics specialist (Denver, CO)

Age: 59 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's about time they adjusted ratings for our real-world situations.
  • This could improve my life significantly.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 5

Teacher (Fort Worth, TX)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • My husband's hearing issues have been an ongoing problem.
  • If this policy improves his condition, it will positively affect our family too.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Retired factory worker (Portland, OR)

Age: 78 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 20/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This doesn't impact me as I wasn't in the military.
  • I'm glad for the veterans who will benefit.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Retired nurse (Anchorage, AK)

Age: 62 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Even as a trained medical professional, my hearing issues have been complex.
  • This policy might provide the missing link in my healthcare.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 5

IT Professional (Chicago, IL)

Age: 38 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • If this can guarantee assistance for my hearing aids, it'll ease a financial burden.
  • Happy that there's recognition of this issue.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Construction Manager (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 54 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • My hearing concerns aren't severe, but if they worsen, this policy could help me stay out of pocket expenses.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Retired electric technician (Seattle, WA)

Age: 71 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 3

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Hearing problems are crippling at this age.
  • I'm hopeful that this will significantly improve my situation.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 3
Year 2 7 3
Year 3 7 3
Year 5 8 2
Year 10 8 2
Year 20 8 2

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $1500000000 (Low: $1200000000, High: $1800000000)

Year 2: $1530000000 (Low: $1224000000, High: $1836000000)

Year 3: $1560600000 (Low: $1248480000, High: $1872720000)

Year 5: $1627432060 (Low: $1301945650, High: $1952918470)

Year 10: $1775022091 (Low: $1420017673, High: $2130026509)

Year 100: $5995342595 (Low: $4796274076, High: $7194411114)

Key Considerations