Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/3544

Bill Overview

Title: Funding Early Childhood is the Right IDEA Act

Description: This bill authorizes through FY2027 specified provisions of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act for early childhood education. Specifically, the bill authorizes Part B, Section 619 (grants to states for preschool programs serving children with disabilities ages three to five) and Part C (grants to aid states in implementing early intervention services for infants and toddlers with disabilities and their families).

Sponsors: Sen. Hassan, Margaret Wood [D-NH]

Target Audience

Population: Children with disabilities aged 0-5 and their families benefiting from early childhood education initiatives

Estimated Size: 500000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Stay-at-home mom (Rural Texas)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I believe this policy could be a game-changer for families like ours.
  • Access to better early intervention services could help my child before starting school.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 7 5

Software Engineer (Suburban Florida)

Age: 40 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I've already seen the benefits of early intervention; more funding can only help.
  • The support we've received is critical, and more families could benefit from this.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Social Worker (Urban California)

Age: 25 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy is essential; I see firsthand the challenges families face without enough resources.
  • Improving these services will help prepare kids for school, leading to better outcomes.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Retired teacher (Rural Ohio)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Any support for early education is good, but will it reach rural areas effectively?
  • The policy is promising, but execution will be key.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Freelance Writer (Rural Alabama)

Age: 28 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • We need more support ASAP; waiting lists are too long.
  • I hope this policy helps, but access still concerns me.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 6 4

Accountant (Urban New York)

Age: 35 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 20/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I don't expect this policy to affect us directly, but I see the societal benefit.
  • Investing in children is always a step forward.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Construction Worker (Suburban Illinois)

Age: 33 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Any additional funding that addresses education for disabilities is welcome.
  • Improved programs may help ease my worries about my child's future.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 6

Teacher (Suburban Oregon)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • More funding could greatly enhance our teaching resources.
  • The students will directly benefit, leading to long-term growth.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Policy Analyst (Urban Washington D.C.)

Age: 38 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This initiative seems like a step in the right direction.
  • Evaluation and adjustments will be crucial to its success.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Retired Nurse (Rural Kentucky)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I worry about access in rural areas; funding should address this.
  • Hopeful that the family will get needed support through this policy.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $300000000 (Low: $250000000, High: $350000000)

Year 2: $300000000 (Low: $250000000, High: $350000000)

Year 3: $300000000 (Low: $250000000, High: $350000000)

Year 5: $300000000 (Low: $250000000, High: $350000000)

Year 10: $300000000 (Low: $250000000, High: $350000000)

Year 100: $300000000 (Low: $250000000, High: $350000000)

Key Considerations