Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/3511

Bill Overview

Title: Satellite Cybersecurity Act

Description: This bill addresses cybersecurity matters related to commercial satellite systems. Specifically, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) must maintain a publicly available clearinghouse of resources concerning the cybersecurity of commercial satellite systems. CISA must also consolidate voluntary recommendations for the development, maintenance, and operation of such systems. The recommendations must include measures to protect systems against cyber-related vulnerabilities, risks, and attacks. To the extent practicable, CISA must implement its activities as a public-private partnership. The bill also requires the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to study and report on (1) federal actions to support the cybersecurity of commercial satellite systems, including with respect to critical infrastructure sectors; and (2) federal reliance on such systems, including those owned or controlled by foreign entities. In carrying out its study and report, the GAO must coordinate with designated federal agencies.

Sponsors: Sen. Peters, Gary C. [D-MI]

Target Audience

Population: People involved in or reliant on commercial satellite systems

Estimated Size: 250000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Cybersecurity Analyst (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think the policy is critical as it will bolster trust in satellite systems.
  • I'm eager to see how the public-private partnerships develop.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 9 4

Satellite Engineer (New York, NY)

Age: 32 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I am optimistic about having more structured guidelines for cybersecurity.
  • This policy might enhance my work quality through better resources.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 9 6
Year 5 9 5
Year 10 9 4
Year 20 8 3

Software Developer (Houson, TX)

Age: 27 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I foresee potential improvements to my work processes.
  • The focus on cybersecurity is long overdue.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Policy Maker (Washington, D.C.)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Policies like this sustain our technological edge.
  • I'm concerned about how swiftly these measures will be executed.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 7

Telecommunications Manager (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 42 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Increased trust in satellite data would benefit the whole network.
  • It's important that practical and clear guidelines emerge from this.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 9 4

Satellite Operations Specialist (Denver, CO)

Age: 39 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It could significantly enhance our operational protocols.
  • Partnerships with private companies will be essential.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 9 5

Network Security Consultant (Miami, FL)

Age: 47 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This initiative might drive demand for my expertise.
  • I hope to see proactive measures become standard.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 9 4

Data Analyst (Chicago, IL)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Enhanced cybersecurity is reassuring for data integrity.
  • Will be closely watching the policy's execution.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 8 5

Telecom Executive (Seattle, WA)

Age: 34 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Strategic for staying ahead in communication technology.
  • Funding and compliance challenges would need addressing.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 6

University Professor (Boston, MA)

Age: 55 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy opens new avenues for academic collaboration and research.
  • I'm hopeful for more educational resources.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $10000000 (Low: $8000000, High: $12000000)

Year 2: $8000000 (Low: $7000000, High: $10000000)

Year 3: $8000000 (Low: $7000000, High: $10000000)

Year 5: $8000000 (Low: $7000000, High: $10000000)

Year 10: $8000000 (Low: $7000000, High: $10000000)

Year 100: $8000000 (Low: $7000000, High: $10000000)

Key Considerations