Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/3509

Bill Overview

Title: Creating Efficiency in Foreign Facility Inspections Act

Description: This bill prohibits, with some exceptions, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from providing notification in advance of a planned inspection of an establishment located outside of the United States that is engaged in drug manufacturing, processing, packing, or holding. Specifically, the FDA may not provide such an establishment advance notification of a planned inspection unless (1) advance notification is required by the laws of the country where the establishment is located; (2) providing advance notification is needed to protect the public health; or (3) the inspection in question is a preapproval, prelicensure, or for-cause inspection. If the FDA must provide advance notification, it must minimize the time between the notification and the inspection. If an establishment is located in a country that, on or after the date this bill is enacted, enacts a law requiring advance notification of inspections, the drug manufacturer must agree to waive the right to enforce the requirement, to the extent expressly permitted by the law.

Sponsors: Sen. Braun, Mike [R-IN]

Target Audience

Population: People consuming drugs from foreign facilities inspected by the FDA

Estimated Size: 330000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Doctor (New York, NY)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I believe the new policy could enhance the safety of the drugs I prescribe, reducing risks for my patients.
  • Unannounced inspections might catch more compliance issues, which is vital.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 6

Pharmacist (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While the policy might improve drug quality oversight, it could initially slow the supply chain, affecting availability.
  • Increased FDA activity abroad is promising but must be seamless.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 6

Retired (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 67 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Ensuring drug safety is important, but I'm worried about potential cost increases if inspections disrupt the supply.
  • Peace of mind knowing that drugs might be safer, but affordability is key for me.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 6

Software Engineer (Austin, TX)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I don't foresee a direct impact on my wellbeing, but I support measures that improve public safety.
  • Additional inspections should benefit those who rely heavily on medications.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Manufacturing Manager (Tampa, FL)

Age: 54 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Heightened foreign inspections level the playing field for domestic manufacturers who already comply with rigorous inspections.
  • This policy could improve the public trust in pharmaceuticals.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 9 6

Public Health Researcher (Seattle, WA)

Age: 38 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Better oversight of foreign facilities is crucial for minimizing adverse drug events.
  • This policy aligns with long-term safety improvements needed for global health.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 8 5

Insurance Underwriter (Chicago, IL)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 1/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Confidence in foreign drug inspections can indirectly influence insurance claims related to drug safety.
  • The impact might be marginal for my work but significant for patients.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 6

Grad Student (Portland, OR)

Age: 25 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's reassuring that drug quality is a priority, but as a low consumer, this won't impact me directly.
  • I support efforts that protect public health broadly.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Retired Pharmacist (Miami, FL)

Age: 72 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Ensuring the safety of pharmaceutical imports is critical at my age.
  • Hoping this doesn't result in burdensome changes that affect availability.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Legal Consultant (Boston, MA)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 1/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy might complicate compliance for international clients but strengthens the FDA's oversight role.
  • Increased complexity could mean higher costs, which may pass on to consumers or create bottlenecks in drug availability.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $10000000 (Low: $8000000, High: $12000000)

Year 2: $9900000 (Low: $7850000, High: $11850000)

Year 3: $9751500 (Low: $7735000, High: $11700000)

Year 5: $9509282 (Low: $7530000, High: $11400000)

Year 10: $9025000 (Low: $7175000, High: $10800000)

Year 100: $5500000 (Low: $4400000, High: $6600000)

Key Considerations