Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/3441

Bill Overview

Title: CDFI Bond Guarantee Program Improvement Act of 2022

Description: This bill permanently reauthorizes and otherwise revises the Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFI) Bond Guarantee Program. Specifically, the bill (1) reduces the CDFI Bond Guarantee Program minimum issuance amount from $100 million to $25 million, and (2) reduces the amount allowed to be held in a CDFI's relending account. (CDFIs are financial institutions serving low-income communities. Designation as a CDFI allows an institution to participate in programs such as the CDFI Bond Guarantee Program. The program provides financing to CDFIs through federal credit subsidies that allow CDFIs to issue bonds.)

Sponsors: Sen. Smith, Tina [D-MN]

Target Audience

Population: People who reside in low-income and underserved communities served by CDFIs

Estimated Size: 30000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Small business owner (Cleveland, OH)

Age: 34 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think the policy will allow more businesses like mine to get the financial help they need.
  • There's a constant struggle to access traditional banking services, so CDFIs are essential.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Teacher (Rural Alabama)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Improving the CDFI program means better facilities and housing for my community.
  • Our community struggles to attract investment, so this could make a real difference.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 5 4
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 5 4

Community organizer (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 50 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy could be a game-changer for many people we support in terms of housing and business.
  • The access to lower bond thresholds will help smaller CDFIs that serve our areas.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 6

Retail worker (Detroit, MI)

Age: 42 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 3

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • If more CDFI services become available to me, I could escape the cycle of high-interest loans.
  • It’s a beacon of hope for people in my situation if access opens up.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 4 3
Year 2 5 3
Year 3 6 3
Year 5 6 3
Year 10 7 3
Year 20 5 3

Retired (New York, NY)

Age: 63 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I’ve seen how these programs can uplift entire blocks with new housing projects.
  • This policy may mean more stability for future low-income housing.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Freelancer (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • With more funds for CDFIs, I might get better rates to help manage my income instability.
  • The policy can support better financial products for freelancers.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 5 4
Year 3 5 4
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 4 4

College student (Jackson, MS)

Age: 23 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Getting more support from CDFIs could help students like me plan for the future.
  • Financial education is key, and this can improve access.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 5 6

Non-profit worker (Chicago, IL)

Age: 31 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 6.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Our programs are often limited by funding, so this policy can inject vital resources.
  • Local nonprofits can be vital partners with CDFIs if well-funded.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 6 7

Entrepreneur (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 47 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The lowered thresholds mean more access to necessary capital for businesses like mine.
  • CDFIs do more than just provide loans; they are bridges to the future.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 6

Social worker (Baltimore, MD)

Age: 38 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • More CDFIs active can mean more personalized financial assistance for families I support.
  • Anything that enhances CDFI capacity will have lasting impacts.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $50000000 (Low: $30000000, High: $70000000)

Year 2: $52000000 (Low: $32000000, High: $74000000)

Year 3: $54000000 (Low: $34000000, High: $78000000)

Year 5: $58000000 (Low: $36000000, High: $82000000)

Year 10: $64000000 (Low: $40000000, High: $90000000)

Year 100: $105000000 (Low: $65000000, High: $145000000)

Key Considerations