Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/3338

Bill Overview

Title: Ste. Genevieve National Historical Park Boundary Revision Act

Description: This bill revises the boundary of the Ste. Genevieve National Historical Park in Missouri. The Department of the Interior may acquire, by donation, the land (including any improvements to the land) owned by the city of Ste. Genevieve, Missouri, and used as the visitor center for the park, as generally identified on the revised map of the park. Upon acquisition of such land, Interior shall revise the boundary of the park to include the acquired land. Interior may acquire, by purchase from a willing seller or by donation, not more than 20 acres of land in the vicinity of the park for administrative facilities for the park.

Sponsors: Sen. Blunt, Roy [R-MO]

Target Audience

Population: People living in the vicinity of Ste. Genevieve National Historical Park

Estimated Size: 13000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Retired (Ste. Genevieve, MO)

Age: 65 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm happy about any effort to preserve our town's history.
  • I worry about potential changes that could disrupt the peace in our community.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Local business owner (Ste. Genevieve County, MO)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Any expansion of the park could bring more visitors, which is good for business.
  • I don't want my property to be acquired by force; willing negotiations are important.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 9 5

Historian (St. Louis, MO)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm optimistic about these changes as they could further preservation efforts.
  • Financial aspects of the policy need transparent handling.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 9
Year 10 8 9
Year 20 8 9

Park Ranger (Ste. Genevieve, MO)

Age: 55 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Expansion could mean better facilities and more resources, which is positive.
  • I am concerned about operational challenges during transition.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 8 7

Local artist (Ste. Genevieve, MO)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The park expanding could provide new subjects for my art and attract more visitors.
  • There is a concern about how quickly changes will take place.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 8 6

Farmer (Ste. Genevieve, MO)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Selling land could provide immediate financial relief.
  • I have mixed feelings about letting go of property that's been in the family for generations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 8 5

School Teacher (Jefferson County, MO)

Age: 40 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The park's development can strengthen local educational resources.
  • I'm cautious about the budget's allocation away from other community services.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Retired Military (Ste. Genevieve County, MO)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm all for improvements that help visitors appreciate our area's history.
  • I want to make sure this doesn't impact veterans negatively, especially regarding the land.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Environmental Scientist (Perry County, MO)

Age: 33 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Policy looks great if it accounts for environmental integrity.
  • Sustainability should be emphasized during infrastructural developments.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Former Park Ranger (Ste. Genevieve, MO)

Age: 71 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Change is necessary to maintain relevance, but it should be balanced with community needs.
  • I'm hoping for an increase in jobs with this expansion.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $2500000 (Low: $2000000, High: $3000000)

Year 2: $2000000 (Low: $1500000, High: $2500000)

Year 3: $1500000 (Low: $1000000, High: $2000000)

Year 5: $1000000 (Low: $800000, High: $1200000)

Year 10: $500000 (Low: $400000, High: $600000)

Year 100: $1000000 (Low: $800000, High: $1200000)

Key Considerations