Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/3141

Bill Overview

Title: New Philadelphia National Historical Park Act

Description: This bill establishes the New Philadelphia National Historical Park in Illinois as a unit of the National Park System. The purposes of the park are to protect, preserve, and interpret the historic resources associated with the town of New Philadelphia, the first town in the United States planned and legally registered by a free African American before the Civil War. The park shall consist of the approximately 124.33 acres of land within the boundary generally identified on the map titled New Philadelphia National Historic Site Proposed Boundary and dated July 2021.

Sponsors: Sen. Durbin, Richard J. [D-IL]

Target Audience

Population: People interested in and affected by the establishment of the New Philadelphia National Historical Park

Estimated Size: 500000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Bed and Breakfast Owner (Pittsfield, Illinois)

Age: 48 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The new park sounds like a great opportunity for local businesses, including mine. I expect more visitors each year.
  • I believe it will put our little town on the map for those interested in history.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 9 5

High School History Teacher (Springfield, Illinois)

Age: 33 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It will be a fantastic resource for our students. Being able to visit the site will make history more tangible for them.
  • I hope it encourages interest in this important part of US history.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 7

Graduate Student in African American Studies (Chicago, Illinois)

Age: 25 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm excited about the park; it represents a significant opportunity for my research.
  • I'm planning to use it both as a study space and to possibly conduct tours.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Retired Museum Curator (Atlanta, Georgia)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Having places like New Philadelphia represented in our national parks is important for historical preservation.
  • I'll definitely include it in my travels whenever I head north.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Cultural Historian (New York, New York)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • A new site like this adds to the important conversation about African American history.
  • I hope to conduct lectures at the park to promote understanding and awareness.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Journalist (St. Louis, Missouri)

Age: 29 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Having new places to cover is always exciting. It'll provide fresh content for travelers interested in history and culture.
  • I'm looking forward to visiting the park once it's officially open.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Historian (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania)

Age: 52 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • New Philadelphia National Historical Park will be a gem in the National Park System. Others like me will appreciate the recognition of this historical site.
  • I plan to suggest it as a site visit to my university's historical field study programs.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Local Government Employee (Jacksonville, Illinois)

Age: 37 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The park project is promising for our region's tourism industry. What benefits the town, benefits individuals like me.
  • I'm supporting measures that will prepare our community for an increase in tourists.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 9 5

National Park Service Administrator (Washington, D.C.)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This park will serve a vital role in educating Americans about important but often overlooked parts of history.
  • I see it as a critical development in the context of our national narrative.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 8 8

Travel Blogger (Los Angeles, California)

Age: 62 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • New Philadelphia is an exciting addition to cultural travel destinations in the US.
  • It’s on my list for upcoming travel itineraries to share with my readers.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $7000000 (Low: $5000000, High: $9000000)

Year 2: $4000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $6000000)

Year 3: $4000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $6000000)

Year 5: $4000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $6000000)

Year 10: $4000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $6000000)

Year 100: $4000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $6000000)

Key Considerations