Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/3092

Bill Overview

Title: FIRE Act

Description: This act addresses the federal government's approach to wildfires. Specifically, the act requires the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to report to Congress regarding the use of relocation assistance under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act for wildfire risk. FEMA, in coordination with the National Weather Service, must study, develop recommendations for, and initiate a process for the use of forecasts and data, including information that supports Red Flag Warnings and similar weather alert and notification methods, to establish plans and actions that can be implemented prior to a wildfire event that can limit the impact, duration, or severity of the fire; and mechanisms to increase interagency collaboration to expedite the delivery of disaster assistance. The Government Accountability Office must report to Congress regarding wildfires, including the effectiveness of FEMA programs. Each state, local agency, or private mental health organization providing professional crisis counseling assistance must ensure that those providing case management services to victims of a major disaster have training to address impacts in communities and to individuals with socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds. FEMA must conduct a study and develop a plan to address providing housing assistance to survivors of major disasters or emergencies when presented with challenges such as the presence of multiple families within a single household. The act allows Indian tribal governments to apply for grants for equipping, upgrading, and constructing state and local emergency operations centers.

Sponsors: Sen. Padilla, Alex [D-CA]

Target Audience

Population: People affected by wildfires and related disaster management programs

Estimated Size: 10000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Firefighter (California)

Age: 35 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The new FEMA policy could significantly help our community by providing better ground preparation and response ahead of wildfire seasons.
  • Training for counselors as well could help families like mine who deal with the stress of constant relocation threats during fire season.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 9 5

Retired (Alaska)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While the policy is crucial, it likely won't affect my daily life here in Alaska directly.
  • However, it's important for federal resources to be used effectively where they are most needed.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Community Leader (Oregon)

Age: 42 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy addresses key issues we face during wildfire seasons.
  • Better coordination with the National Weather Service could improve safety and response times in our community.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Tribal Government Official (New Mexico)

Age: 29 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The grants available to tribal governments are a significant boost to our capacity and infrastructure.
  • This policy will positively affect our ability to respond to emergencies efficiently.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 4
Year 2 7 4
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 9 4

College Student (Colorado)

Age: 23 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While I'm not directly affected, I think improving FEMA's response to wildfires can alleviate national resources spent on disaster recovery, which eventually benefits everyone.
  • It's good to have policies in place when the climate crisis worsens such a situation.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 8 7

Psychologist (Florida)

Age: 51 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The training for crisis counselors will certainly enhance the support system available to victims of wildfires, potentially improving mental health outcomes.
  • This can bridge gaps in recovery support, which often see underfunding.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Small Business Owner (Nevada)

Age: 47 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Upgrades in forecasting and FEMA assistance can save businesses like mine from total devastation.
  • The effort to streamline disaster assistance is crucial for recovery.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 9 5

Real Estate Agent (Texas)

Age: 33 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The measure for improved housing assistance could help stabilize affected populations, crucial for areas I've worked in when managing multiple family households.
  • I hope it translates to smoother transitions post-disaster.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Social Worker (Washington)

Age: 37 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The training opportunities for case managers are a much-needed resource, given the challenges we face.
  • It helps in providing more structured support to those in need.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 8 5

Farmer (Montana)

Age: 55 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Improving early warnings and inter-agency coordination is essential for protecting agricultural interests.
  • This policy is a positive step but needs to be paired with local knowledge applications.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $196000000 (Low: $160000000, High: $230000000)

Year 2: $196000000 (Low: $160000000, High: $230000000)

Year 3: $196000000 (Low: $160000000, High: $230000000)

Year 5: $196000000 (Low: $160000000, High: $230000000)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations