Bill Overview
Title: GOOD AI Act of 2021
Description: This bill directs the Office of Management and Budget to (1) incorporate specified considerations and principles, and the input of specified individuals and entities, in developing an update of guidance for federal agency use of artificial intelligence; and (2) establish an Artificial Intelligence Hygiene Working Group.
Sponsors: Sen. Peters, Gary C. [D-MI]
Target Audience
Population: People employed by or contracting with federal agencies
Estimated Size: 7800000
- The bill affects how federal agencies in the United States develop and update their use of artificial intelligence (AI).
- Federal agencies employ a significant number of people who would need to adapt to new guidelines for AI use.
- Contractors and businesses who supply AI technologies to federal agencies will need to align with the new guidelines.
- Changes in AI usage and guidance can affect U.S. citizens who receive services or are indirectly impacted by federal operations, but this impact is more diffuse.
Reasoning
- The target population for the policy includes federal agency employees and contractors who are directly involved with AI, thus impacting them through changes in work processes and requirements.
- The policy might also indirectly affect a broader population through changes in how AI-driven services are delivered by federal agencies.
- The $50 million budget in the first year suggests a limited but focused start, likely prioritizing key agencies and AI applications with broader implications.
- We include a range of individuals, from high-intensity AI users in agencies to more peripheral stakeholders, and even some unaffected individuals to illustrate the scope of impact.
Simulated Interviews
AI Policy Analyst (Washington, D.C.)
Age: 45 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I believe the policy will bring much-needed oversight and standardized practices in AI usage.
- The increased focus on data hygiene will enhance trust in AI systems, but it will require substantial adjustment.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
AI Software Developer (California)
Age: 32 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Adapting to new guidelines could slow down some projects initially but will improve long-term productivity.
- There's always a worry about potential increased bureaucracy slowing innovation.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
Federal Agency Employee (Texas)
Age: 39 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 15/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm concerned about the additional training this might require but hopeful it will lead to increased job security.
- The guidelines could provide better structure to our technology use.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 5 |
Data Privacy Advocate (New York)
Age: 55 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This is a positive move towards protecting individual privacy and ensuring data integrity.
- There's always a fear that implementation might not align with policy intent.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Graduate Student in AI Ethics (Chicago)
Age: 26 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This is an exciting time as policies like the GOOD AI Act shape the future landscape of AI ethics.
- I'm optimistic about the potential effects such regulations have, though they must be carefully crafted to avoid stifling innovation.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 8 |
Federal Grant Coordinator (Virginia)
Age: 43 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 14/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I anticipate increased workloads but also opportunities for new grants aligned with the policy.
- The guidelines could streamline processes, benefiting how we handle grants.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Startup Founder (Colorado)
Age: 30 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- While the new regulations might present hurdles, they could also open avenues through clearer standards of compliance.
- There is always a possibility of increased operational costs.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
Public Relations for Federal Agency (Florida)
Age: 52 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 11/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy will inevitably affect how we communicate our technology initiatives.
- It's an opportunity to enhance transparency and public trust in our operations.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Retired (Ohio)
Age: 60 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm somewhat removed from current policies, but it's interesting to see increased regulation.
- I hope this translates to more secure and efficient AI systems.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 5 |
AI Researcher (Massachusetts)
Age: 29 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Policies like the GOOD AI Act might redirect my research focus, but they offer a framework for ethical development.
- I'm excited to see these guidelines shape the responsible use of AI.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 10 | 9 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 9 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $50000000 (Low: $40000000, High: $60000000)
Year 2: $40000000 (Low: $35000000, High: $50000000)
Year 3: $30000000 (Low: $25000000, High: $40000000)
Year 5: $20000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $30000000)
Year 10: $10000000 (Low: $7000000, High: $20000000)
Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $5000000)
Key Considerations
- Ensuring compliance across diverse federal agencies with varying levels of existing AI capabilities might present significant challenges.
- Potential reluctance or resistance among stakeholders needing to adapt to new AI guidelines.
- Coordination and consultation with AI experts and industry stakeholders are crucial to the bill's successful implementation.