Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/2773

Bill Overview

Title: Unleashing American Innovators Act of 2022

Description: This bill modifies the responsibilities of U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) satellite offices and addresses related issues. The bill increases the discount on patent-related fees for small and micro entities. An entity that falsely claims such a discount shall be subject to a fine, in addition to any other existing penalties. The bill also modifies the statutory purpose of PTO satellite offices to include (1) outreach activities targeting certain groups, such as low-income populations, veterans, and geographic groups that are underrepresented in patent filings; and (2) targeting patent examiners and administrative patent judges from economically, geographically, and demographically diverse backgrounds in the PTO's retention activities. For each satellite office established after January 1, 2023, the PTO must consider the office's proximity to anchor institutions (e.g., hospitals primarily serving veterans and institutions of higher education) and certain groups, such as low-income populations, veterans, and geographic groups that are underrepresented in patent filings. The PTO must establish (1) a satellite office in the southeastern United States within three years of this bill's enactment, (2) at least four community outreach offices throughout the United States within five years of this bill's enactment, and (3) a pilot program to help prospective first-time patent applicants assess the strengths and weaknesses of a potential patent application. The PTO must also (1) conduct and report to Congress a study on patent pro bono programs, including whether such programs are sufficiently serving prospective and existing participants; and (2) use the study's findings to update such pro bono programs.

Sponsors: Sen. Leahy, Patrick J. [D-VT]

Target Audience

Population: people who engage with or benefit from the USPTO and patent-related activities

Estimated Size: 100000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

small business owner (Raleigh, NC)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The increased discounts on patent fees could significantly help my startup reduce costs.
  • I'm optimistic about the new Southeastern office, it might offer more localized support.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 5

patent attorney (Austin, TX)

Age: 32 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy is likely to increase the workload as more small entities can afford patent filing.
  • It might help me tap into new client bases from underrepresented areas.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

engineer (Detroit, MI)

Age: 28 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The focus on veterans and regional support could help hobby inventors like me who aren't in major tech hubs.
  • I hope to see improved access to patent support services locally.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 4

software developer (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 39 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Discounted fees could relieve financial pressures on our startup.
  • I hope the community outreach offices prioritize tech startups.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 9 5

executive in a large tech company (Palo Alto, CA)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy doesn't directly impact large companies much as our fee structure isn't changing significantly.
  • We do benefit from a more diverse pool of PTO employees which could enhance the review process.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

academic researcher (Seattle, WA)

Age: 38 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Access to improved patent support and outreach can enhance academic-commercial collaboration.
  • It may lead to better IP management for our research projects.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 5

retired veteran (Birmingham, AL)

Age: 55 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Targeted outreach to veterans like me could open opportunities in consulting after retirement.
  • Looking forward to quicker access to PTO resources.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 5

freelance IP consultant (Boston, MA)

Age: 41 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Increased support to integrate patents in educational curriculums could expand my consulting work.
  • The policy emphasizes systematic support which could streamline the patent education process.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 6

community organizer (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 29 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy's community outreach aligns with my goals to boost tech innovation in underrepresented communities.
  • It presents a chance to develop local patent literacy and engagement.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 5

retired engineer (Kansas City, MO)

Age: 62 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Supporting diverse backgrounds in patenting processes can drive forward-thinking innovations.
  • Retired professionals like me can contribute through part-time mentorship roles.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 5 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $75000000 (Low: $50000000, High: $100000000)

Year 2: $79000000 (Low: $52000000, High: $105000000)

Year 3: $83000000 (Low: $55000000, High: $110000000)

Year 5: $85000000 (Low: $57000000, High: $115000000)

Year 10: $90000000 (Low: $60000000, High: $120000000)

Year 100: $15000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $20000000)

Key Considerations