Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/2541

Bill Overview

Title: Shadow Wolves Enhancement Act

Description: This bill authorizes U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to reclassify officers assigned to the tactical patrol unit on Tohono O'odham Nation land, commonly known as Shadow Wolves , as ICE special agents upon completing certain required training. Officers assigned to a comparable unit, regardless of location, may also be reclassified as ICE special agents upon completing the training and receiving the approval and consent of the appropriate Indian tribe. The Department of Homeland Security and the Government Accountability Office shall separately study and report on the best processes for expanding the Shadow Wolves program.

Sponsors: Sen. Sinema, Kyrsten [D-AZ]

Target Audience

Population: People associated with the Tohono O'odham Nation and other tribal nations with similar units

Estimated Size: 50000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Law enforcement officer (Tohono O'odham Nation, Arizona)

Age: 35 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I see this as a great opportunity to enhance our capabilities and recognition.
  • Being reclassified as an ICE special agent could provide more resources and training, which can improve job satisfaction.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 8 5

Advocate for tribal rights (Phoenix, Arizona)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy could increase militarization, which worries some community members.
  • However, potential positive impacts on safety and job satisfaction could benefit the communities.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 9 6

Teacher (Tohono O'odham Nation, Arizona)

Age: 43 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm supportive of providing officers with more opportunities for career advancement.
  • We need to ensure the program aligns with our community's values and priorities.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 5 3

ICE officer (Tucson, Arizona)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy might improve collaboration between ICE and tribal officers.
  • Concerns include maintaining respect for tribal sovereignty.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Unemployed (Flagstaff, Arizona)

Age: 25 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Heard about the policy, but it doesn't directly affect me unless job opportunities increase.
  • Any government investment in the area is welcomed.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 4 4
Year 2 4 4
Year 3 4 4
Year 5 4 4
Year 10 4 4
Year 20 4 4

Lawyer specializing in tribal law (Santa Fe, New Mexico)

Age: 32 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm concerned about the potential overreach of federal authority on tribal lands.
  • However, if handled properly, it could set positive precedents in federal-tribal relations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 9 6

Cultural liaison (Tohono O'odham Nation, Arizona)

Age: 39 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm optimistic but cautious about the policy's impact on preserving our traditions.
  • We must ensure the policy respects our cultural practices.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

Federal government employee (Sacramento, California)

Age: 48 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The expansion of the Shadow Wolves program could be a positive step for federal collaboration with tribes.
  • It's crucial to ensure sustainability and respect for tribal laws.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Retired military officer (Chicago, Illinois)

Age: 58 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Investing in tribal units like the Shadow Wolves can enhance national security.
  • I hope this policy fosters better understanding between tribal and national agencies.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

College student (Albuquerque, New Mexico)

Age: 22 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy might open new opportunities for indigenous people in law enforcement careers.
  • It's exciting to see policies that might impact my future career choices positively.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $5000000 (Low: $4000000, High: $6000000)

Year 2: $6000000 (Low: $5000000, High: $7000000)

Year 3: $6000000 (Low: $5000000, High: $7000000)

Year 5: $7000000 (Low: $6000000, High: $8000000)

Year 10: $7000000 (Low: $6000000, High: $8000000)

Year 100: $7000000 (Low: $6000000, High: $8000000)

Key Considerations