Bill Overview
Title: CISA Technical Corrections and Improvements Act of 2021
Description: This bill makes technical corrections to certain statutes relating to cybersecurity.
Sponsors: Sen. Portman, Rob [R-OH]
Target Audience
Population: Global cybersecurity workforce
Estimated Size: 1000
- The CISA Technical Corrections and Improvements Act aims at making technical corrections to statutes related to cybersecurity.
- Cybersecurity involves the protection of digital devices including computers, servers, mobile devices, electronic systems, and data from malicious attacks.
- Given the universal use of digital devices and systems, the global population potentially impacted includes all users of these technologies.
- Businesses, government agencies, and individual users globally rely on cybersecurity measures to protect digital information.
- Errors or inefficiencies in cybersecurity laws could affect the safety and integrity of data for any user connected to digital platforms.
Reasoning
- This policy is primarily geared towards enhancing the implementation of existing cybersecurity measures, which might not have a direct and immediate effect on individual users' day-to-day life.
- However, it indirectly impacts overall digital security, reducing risks of data breaches and identity theft, thus contributing to a sense of safety and well-being.
- The impact on wellbeing will vary among individuals based on their awareness of cybersecurity issues, the importance of digital security in their personal or professional lives, and whether they have been affected by cybersecurity incidents before.
- Given the wide reach of the internet, a large portion of the population (both individuals and companies) uses digital platforms, making them beneficiaries of improved cybersecurity even if they are not aware of it.
Simulated Interviews
Software Engineer (San Francisco, CA)
Age: 35 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I think technical corrections in cybersecurity laws are essential.
- These improvements will help protect companies and users better.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
Year 20 | 9 | 7 |
Small Business Owner (Atlanta, GA)
Age: 58 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Cybersecurity improvements are long overdue.
- Small businesses are vulnerable to cyber attacks, so any additional protection is welcome.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
Graphic Designer (Austin, TX)
Age: 27 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I hope these corrections safeguard freelancers like me.
- We depend heavily on digital platforms, so security is crucial to prevent data loss.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
Year 5 | 6 | 5 |
Year 10 | 6 | 5 |
Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Government Employee (New York, NY)
Age: 45 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 15/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Improving cybersecurity is crucial for government agencies.
- It will protect sensitive data from getting compromised.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 9 | 8 |
Year 2 | 9 | 8 |
Year 3 | 9 | 8 |
Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
Year 20 | 9 | 8 |
College Student (Columbus, OH)
Age: 19 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 18/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I haven't thought much about cybersecurity, but I guess it's important.
- With everything online these days, we'd be safer with improved security protocols.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Retired (Miami, FL)
Age: 67 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 13/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Security improvements mean a lot for older people like myself.
- Feeling secure online can significantly impact our daily activities.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
Year 10 | 7 | 5 |
Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
Factory Worker (Detroit, MI)
Age: 52 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 20/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I don't see how cybersecurity affects my everyday life.
- I suppose it's good for those who use the internet more.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Tech Startup Founder (Seattle, WA)
Age: 31 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 9
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Technical corrections are crucial for upcoming startups.
- It signals the government's commitment to supporting tech industries.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 9 | 9 |
Year 2 | 9 | 9 |
Year 3 | 9 | 9 |
Year 5 | 10 | 9 |
Year 10 | 10 | 9 |
Year 20 | 10 | 9 |
Cybersecurity Analyst (Chicago, IL)
Age: 43 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- These corrections are a step in the right direction.
- They will streamline processes and bolster national cybersecurity standards.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 9 | 8 |
Year 2 | 9 | 8 |
Year 3 | 9 | 8 |
Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
Year 20 | 9 | 8 |
Digital Artist (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 29 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 7.0 years
Commonness: 14/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Cybersecurity improvements help protect my intellectual property.
- Feel more secure knowing there are steps to safeguard digital creations.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $15000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $20000000)
Year 2: $12000000 (Low: $8000000, High: $16000000)
Year 3: $10000000 (Low: $7000000, High: $13000000)
Year 5: $8000000 (Low: $6000000, High: $10000000)
Year 10: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $7000000)
Year 100: $1000000 (Low: $500000, High: $1500000)
Key Considerations
- The global nature of the internet means any cybersecurity improvement can have widespread implications.
- The act may involve collaboration with international cybersecurity organizations, which could influence global standards and practices.
- Technical corrections can reduce vulnerabilities and improve the trustworthiness of U.S. digital infrastructure.