Policy Impact Analysis - 117/S/2427

Bill Overview

Title: FAIR Contributions Act

Description: This bill requires the Federal Communications Commission to study and report on the feasibility of funding the Universal Service Fund through contributions from edge providers (i.e., providers of online content or services, such as search engines).

Sponsors: Sen. Wicker, Roger F. [R-MS]

Target Audience

Population: Internet Users

Estimated Size: 300000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

freelance content creator (Brooklyn, NY)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm all for fair contributions if it improves internet access broader across different communities.
  • Though, if larger platforms begin charging edge users like myself more, it might affect my business.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

small business owner (Dallas, TX)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • There's potential here for expanding internet coverage, which might benefit more remote parts of the state.
  • If costs rise, I'll need to reconsider my online ad spending.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 9 6

software engineer (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 25 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The company might shift some priorities if this study leads to new funding mechanisms we must follow.
  • While I believe in equitable internet access, I also think there could be some internal job restructuring.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 7 8
Year 5 7 9
Year 10 8 9
Year 20 9 9

retired (Rural Iowa)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • If this funding can improve rural internet access, it would mean a lot to our community.
  • I'm not heavily reliant on the internet daily, but more access would be nice for times when I do need it.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 8 5

college student (Philadelphia, PA)

Age: 19 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm concerned that if companies pass costs forward, my internet bill could go up.
  • But more funding to universal access might give my peers who struggle with costs easier access.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

internet service provider executive (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Any new funding rule could impact our business model; however, I'm optimistic it will lead to positive sector reform.
  • This could open up new market opportunities by expanding service coverage areas.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

journalist (Chicago, IL)

Age: 28 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's crucial to monitor if edge providers plan to transfer operational costs to consumers.
  • The policy presents a chance to address internet equity, which is an ongoing narrative I report on.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

digital marketing specialist (Miami, FL)

Age: 42 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Access to affordable internet across all areas could resolve some digital divide issues.
  • But if online platforms become costly, I might need to reallocate budget spending.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

remote software developer (Portland, OR)

Age: 38 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Policy initiatives like this ensure that everyone can stay connected, a necessity reflected in my work environment.
  • Any cost hikes by edge providers could affect my household's budget minimally.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 9 9

community organizer (Anchorage, AK)

Age: 55 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Internet service can be inconsistent and expensive up here—anything to facilitate better access is welcome.
  • It's a waiting game; how the edge providers will participate remains unclear.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 9 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $8000000)

Year 2: $1000000 (Low: $500000, High: $1500000)

Year 3: $1000000 (Low: $500000, High: $1500000)

Year 5: $1000000 (Low: $500000, High: $1500000)

Year 10: $1000000 (Low: $500000, High: $1500000)

Year 100: $1000000 (Low: $500000, High: $1500000)

Key Considerations